| Author |
Message |
Captain Patrick
Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2421
|
 Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:16 am Hills of Dreams |
|
Vue Infinite and Photoshop CS2
|
|
|
Admiral Dani�l
Dutch Admiral
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 2177
Location: Borg Cube 31572 - Join us now!
|
| Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:01 am |
|
Magical...
|
|
|
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding
|
| Sat Jul 15, 2006 1:22 pm |
|
Beautiful texture, shade, and color on that tree! I feel like there's something a little off on the plants in the foreground, but I can't put my finger on it. Overall you did a wonderful job!
|
|
|
WeAz
Commodore
Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:45 am |
|
It looks incredible, but the tree doesn't look right with those plants...
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:49 am |
|
| TrekkieMage wrote: | | I feel like there's something a little off on the plants in the foreground, but I can't put my finger on it. Overall you did a wonderful job! |
If it were a true picture, which it's not, it's all generated, but still, if it were taken with a proper camera, and the tree was the center of focus for the picture, then the flowers in the foreground would be a little bit blurred. That's what's off about them...The picture is too perfect. Too crisp and clear...
But otherwise, I do love the picture...
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
Captain Patrick
Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2421
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:37 am |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | TrekkieMage wrote: | | I feel like there's something a little off on the plants in the foreground, but I can't put my finger on it. Overall you did a wonderful job! |
If it were a true picture, which it's not, it's all generated, but still, if it were taken with a proper camera, and the tree was the center of focus for the picture, then the flowers in the foreground would be a little bit blurred. That's what's off about them...The picture is too perfect. Too crisp and clear...
But otherwise, I do love the picture... |
Your not extactly right, even if it was a true picture then it would not have to be blurry at the front only if you had a Depth of Feild Filter turned on your SLR, but yeah it is too perfect but it is not wrong in that sense that it would have to be blurry up front.
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:20 pm |
|
I never said it was WRONG, just that COULD be what she's thinking...
But you're right...depends on the setting your camera is on...Like my camera has a "Close up" and "Distant object" setting on it and the close up would focus on the tree and make the foreground blurred, while the distant setting would not blur the flowers...so much...
But you are correct in that sense...
But if it were a TV show that was looking at the tree, the camera that they would use would have the foreground flowers blurred. I can almost guarantee it because they do things like that. And I've seen enough movies and shows that if they looked at your tree, the flowers would be blurred.  lol... 
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
Captain Patrick
Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2421
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:11 pm |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | I never said it was WRONG, just that COULD be what she's thinking... |
My aplogies, i did not write what i meant to say the right way, i did not mean to imply you your implying it was worng. just my choice of wording...
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | But you're right...depends on the setting your camera is on...Like my camera has a "Close up" and "Distant object" setting on it and the close up would focus on the tree and make the foreground blurred, while the distant setting would not blur the flowers...so much... |
Yes its a Depth of Feild thing, i don't really like to use depth of feild to much. What kind of camera do you have?
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | But if it were a TV show that was looking at the tree, the camera that they would use would have the foreground flowers blurred. I can almost guarantee it because they do things like that. And I've seen enough movies and shows that if they looked at your tree, the flowers would be blurred. |
Yes your right they would, but i don't never really liked to use depth of feild always comes out looking weird when i use it.
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:20 pm |
|
Oh really!? I LOVE using Depth of Field! It's totally awesome! Now that I have the appropriate camera to do such things with...
This is the camera I have...
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=3626648
But the one that I have is NOT digital...I only spent about $200 for the camera I have...this one is digital making it about $900. So I opted for the film version of it...lol
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
Captain Patrick
Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2421
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:11 pm |
|
Oh ya, I know I can't do much...but I too am saving up for such a lens....trust me...I want one... *drools* lol
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
