Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:44 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
New NBC series stirs controversy
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Monster
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 337
Location: The Great Plains

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:46 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
Whether or not Jesus was divine is open to interpretation, everyone can agree with it. So why should picturing him as being perhaps more human-like be a bad thing? It isn't as if they're necessarily making him out to be sinful.

Good points. However, since we don't know how Jesus would react, we shouldn't try to depict Him in artificially created situations, like a TV show. It would be like me answering this post for you. What I would say is probably not going to be what you intend to say.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Monster
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 337
Location: The Great Plains

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:47 pm    

Founder wrote:
Monster wrote:
Founder wrote:
I agree that this show isn't evil and they are depicting Jesus in a wise but somewhat sarcastic manner. Not really bad anywho. I was disturbed because it was implied that they were going to depict him as a sex crazed maniac. If that is not the case, then I don't mind.

I also don't mind if there are movie/tv show depictions of Jesus. All of them fall short of who he truly is, but thats the point of tv and movies, none of it is real.

But if they all fall short, why is ok for people to keep trying. Like I said earlier, there should be some, but not total, separation of Church and TV.


But then great movies like The Passion of the Christ would not be made. There are tons of Religious themed movies. Not to mention, whether movies want to admit it or not, many movies have religious themes.

Star Wars: Anakin is born of a virgin birth. He is a chosen one who will bring balance to the Force. He is part of a RELIGIOUS order who worships a higher "force".
Matrix: Too many Biblical referances in that movie, but here is some. Neo is a "messiah" to Zion(a place in the Bible). His body dies in a cross like position. He died and came back to life. The list goes on and on.

If we force seperation of church and tv/movies, then we lost a lot of good freaking movies. Blasphemy to any who agree to this! We would have no Neo!!!!

But on a serious note, Religion has played such a pivotal role in tv/movies. Not ALL of course, but a decent amount. To lose that because producers can't make a likeness of an omnipotent being is not fair. I mean...they have their work cut out for them.

I think it's okay to make movies based on events in the Bible or REAL life stories of other people. But to make up some story and stick Jesus in the middle is wrong.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:47 pm    

Monster wrote:
IntrepidIsMe wrote:
Whether or not Jesus was divine is open to interpretation, everyone can agree with it. So why should picturing him as being perhaps more human-like be a bad thing? It isn't as if they're necessarily making him out to be sinful.

Good points. However, since we don't know how Jesus would react, we shouldn't try to depict Him in artificially created situations, like a TV show. It would be like me answering this post for you. What I would say is probably not going to be what you intend to say.



So perhaps we shouldn't make any movies or TV shows based off of real-life people? Seems kinda weird.



-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Monster
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 337
Location: The Great Plains

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:48 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
Monster wrote:
IntrepidIsMe wrote:
Whether or not Jesus was divine is open to interpretation, everyone can agree with it. So why should picturing him as being perhaps more human-like be a bad thing? It isn't as if they're necessarily making him out to be sinful.

Good points. However, since we don't know how Jesus would react, we shouldn't try to depict Him in artificially created situations, like a TV show. It would be like me answering this post for you. What I would say is probably not going to be what you intend to say.



So perhaps we shouldn't make any movies or TV shows based off of real-life people? Seems kinda weird.

But 'The Book of Daniel' is not based on real-life experiences (I think).


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:50 pm    

So I take it people have a problem with the WWJD sayings? Is it "wrong" to think to yourself... "Okay, so what would Jesus do?" I don't think so. Why does it matter if we think this line, and then express it in film?

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:51 pm    

Monster wrote:
I think it's okay to make movies based on events in the Bible or REAL life stories of other people. But to make up some story and stick Jesus in the middle is wrong.


Why is it wrong though?

Again, the depiction of Jesus is not bad. He is a friend and a companion to this priest.

It also adds to the duality of is he seeing Jesus or depiction of what he THINKS is Jesus due to the medication he is taking?


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Monster
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 337
Location: The Great Plains

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 5:53 pm    

Exalya wrote:
So I take it people have a problem with the WWJD sayings? Is it "wrong" to think to yourself... "Okay, so what would Jesus do?" I don't think so. Why does it matter if we think this line, and then express it in film?

Jesus has laid out "rules of conduct" for everyone throughout the Bilbe, and Jesus demonstrated the rules. He is the perfect example. The reason I have a problem with the show depicting Jesus is that the secular world will most likely portray Jesus in a not-so-true form. People who love Jesus are going to try to portray him better than secular network TV writers.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 6:05 pm    

Exalya wrote:
So I take it people have a problem with the WWJD sayings? Is it "wrong" to think to yourself... "Okay, so what would Jesus do?" I don't think so. Why does it matter if we think this line, and then express it in film?


This hits it right on the head.

Daniel has a personal relationship with Jesus. Jesus talking to him is just expressing that relationship visually--and television is a visual medium. The Jesus we see--a gently wisecracking bud who looks like he walked out of a children's bible picture book--is Daniel's personal conception of what Jesus looks like, and how they communicate.

To those--especially those who were dead against it--who've considered tuning in thanks to my commentary: Thanks. That's a compliment to my posts, and I appreciate that. You may still not like it--not every program is everyone's cuppa--but I'm pretty sure you won't find it nearly as horrible as the hoo-ha has made it out to be.



-------signature-------

Resume your disorder.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Monster
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 337
Location: The Great Plains

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 6:07 pm    

teya wrote:
Exalya wrote:
So I take it people have a problem with the WWJD sayings? Is it "wrong" to think to yourself... "Okay, so what would Jesus do?" I don't think so. Why does it matter if we think this line, and then express it in film?


This hits it right on the head.

Daniel has a personal relationship with Jesus. Jesus talking to him is just expressing that relationship visually--and television is a visual medium. The Jesus we see--a gently wisecracking bud who looks like he walked out of a children's bible picture book--is Daniel's personal conception of what Jesus looks like, and how they communicate.

To those--especially those who were dead against it--who've considered tuning in thanks to my commentary: Thanks. That's a compliment to my posts, and I appreciate that. You may still not like it--not every program is everyone's cuppa--but I'm pretty sure you won't find it nearly as horrible as the hoo-ha has made it out to be.

Well I see your point, and my viewpoint has been changed somewhat as a result. I just hope that this show doesn't turn into a misrepresenting show that I once thought it was.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 6:08 pm    

Founder wrote:
It also adds to the duality of is he seeing Jesus or depiction of what he THINKS is Jesus due to the medication he is taking?


I suppose that's another way to look at it, but Vicodin isn't a hallucinogen. And Jesus is definitely not approving of Daniel's habit.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostSun Jan 08, 2006 6:21 pm    

I'm gonna watch the first episode tonight, I'm actually looking forward to it now. I always liked a good controversial TV or movie

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 6:53 pm    

Reading a lot of what's written here and what I've heard and read in newspapers and Radio shows People seem to be condeming this series before seeing it because it's based on christianity.

So we're allowed to have comedy shows with Gay people (Will and Grace), Social Misfits (Friends), Intellectual morons (Frasier) and a whole bunch of other things, but when it comes to christianity, people scream, rant and holler that it should be banned from the airways? That's not fair to the people, nore should religion be allowed to dictate what is on TV stations.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 7:00 pm    

I really don't want to get into a debate over this again, but it's necessary to point out that it's not because it's "about Christianity" (just look at 7th Heaven), which it's not, but it's rather about the things with REGARDS to Christianity and the priest--with such dysfunction, immorality, etc--that's getting the people in an uproar.
Personally, I don't care if they make a show about Christianity. They have to be careful about it, though. But look at Touched by an Angel and 7th Heaven. All highly successful shows, yet no uproar. Why? Because it wasn't taking such dysfunction and immorality and putting it into a show about a priest and his family, that's why.
And I think you have it wrong, Link. If a TV show about a Rabbi and his dysfunctional family or a Imam and his dysfunctional family--maybe his son wants to get involved in terrorism?--it would be wrong and encountering a much bigger uproar, particularly by the politically incorrect crowd, than this. But of course (and whether or not this really is this), Christian-bashing is okay. Just not Jewish or Muslim bashing.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 7:03 pm    

This is another example of liberal Americans hating everything or denying everything relating to Christianity.

I think this show is great.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 7:20 pm    

borgslayer wrote:
This is another example of liberal Americans hating everything or denying everything relating to Christianity.

I think this show is great.


First, it's not liberals opposed to it. Secondly, it's not something Christianity should be endorsed, but opposed. There are a LOT of other things relating to Christianity that we can show. Not this Christian-bashing stuff that this show has, which is why there's an uproar--not because it's Christian, but because it's seen as yet another attack on Christianity.
Whether or not this is entirely so I do not yet know, but will this Friday.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 7:23 pm    

I saw part of the show. I liked what they were trying to do. The problem is they failed miserably. The script stunk, and the acting is even worse. It's a horribly done show - controversy aside.

If they came at this from a more subtle and well constructed angle I'd support it more. But they really are not accomplishing anything with what they're doing.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 10:17 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
I really don't want to get into a debate over this again, but it's necessary to point out that it's not because it's "about Christianity" (just look at 7th Heaven), which it's not, but it's rather about the things with REGARDS to Christianity and the priest--with such dysfunction, immorality, etc--that's getting the people in an uproar.
Personally, I don't care if they make a show about Christianity. They have to be careful about it, though. But look at Touched by an Angel and 7th Heaven. All highly successful shows, yet no uproar. Why? Because it wasn't taking such dysfunction and immorality and putting it into a show about a priest and his family, that's why.
And I think you have it wrong, Link. If a TV show about a Rabbi and his dysfunctional family or a Imam and his dysfunctional family--maybe his son wants to get involved in terrorism?--it would be wrong and encountering a much bigger uproar, particularly by the politically incorrect crowd, than this. But of course (and whether or not this really is this), Christian-bashing is okay. Just not Jewish or Muslim bashing.


First off, it's a comedy show. Co-me-dy. It has nothing to do with dramas like 7th heaven or anything else. It's a comedy, meaning it's supposed to be funny, which from parts I've been able to see, it succeeds at.

And yes, maybe you dont want to see it that way, your main argument is that it's because it's a comedy about christianity. You apparently wouldn't care if it was another religion from your speeches before, but christianity's a no no.

And again, no one is forcing you to post, if you do not want to debate something then you have the Choice to not post. Just because You dont want to debate something doesn't mean that everyone else does too.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 11:04 pm    

I wasn't aware that I felt that way, Link. Where did you draw the conclusion that I would be fine with a "comedy" about Judaism or Islam, because I don't recall saying anything that would even remotely suggest that; I never implied it once. As a matter of fact, I believe I've said the opposite, and believe the opposite .
This isn't just a comedy, Link. It's an attack on Christianity and making a priest's family so dysfunctional and immoral in such a way that it shouldn't. I wouldn't even call it a comedy, it's so innapropriate.
Yes, I haven't seen it. But yes, I have seen commercials, as well as reviews from those that haven't and have seen it saying that it's horrifying. And I'm sure that I'll be offended by the portrayal of this priest and everything surrounding him. (My argument, hint hint, is not that it's about Christianity, but what's in it revolving around the relations of this priest, his persona, etc.) But I am, in light of teya's schpeel and the thoughts of others, reserving final opinions until I see it this Friday.

NO religion should be used in such a way. Not Christianity, not Judaism, not Islam, not Buddhism--I don't care which. (Of course I feel even worse about Christianity, but that's because, although I'm not devout, I am Christian; but that doesn't change the fact that my opinion stands for all faiths.)
I have personal objections to this show that may only change once I see it. Whether or not I see it depends on when I get the chance, and I'm betting (but not positive, of course) that when I turn the TV off from the show (whether I see the whole thing or not; that depends on if I feel the need to turn it off during) my opinion won't change much. But I'm going to give it a chance and see for myself, in particular to appease those that are saying that I can't make a judgment about it before I see it--just like they did prior to F. 9/11, which I came out with the same opinion from, if not worsened.
But until I do see it, I'm going to defend the side that has little voice here; that is, the opposition side.

And let me clear something up: it's the station's right to put it on. It's my right to disagree with it and think that it should come off the air, as it is for all people.

Oh, and btw. There's a difference between having comedies about "Social Misfits," as you called Friends (which I just never had interest in), and "Intellectual Morons," as you called Fraiser (which I do, on the other hand, like) and having a show about a Christian PRIEST with such troubles. Do you not understand where we're coming from at all with our position? (honest question) It's NOT the fact that it's a "comedy" about Christianity. It's about the family. About how things are in it, relating to this PRIEST. That's where the majority of objections lie, and some do on Jesus--but not so much by me.
If you want to have a Christian comedy, fine. But it doesn't need to be like this. It seems like they're going out of their way to be offensive...but I digress.

Again, I'm giving it some chance this Friday when I watch it, so I'll reserve final opinions until then. Feel free to disagree with whatever my judgments are, and my opinions now. Yours are respected, however, as much as I might disagree.

(And FYI, I never said anything about everyone not debating--just that I didn't really want to debate further because of what the ramifications could be. But I feel the need to now.)



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostWed Jan 11, 2006 11:51 pm    

uh.... It's a TV show, I dont really see the problem over a tv show lol.

BTW? according to IMDB, its a "Comedy/Drama"


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostThu Jan 12, 2006 12:02 am    

It's content, LB, content. It's a problem with the content of the show.
The farthest in humor I believe I'll go in terms of religion and stuff is the Jewish and Christian stuff in Mel Brooks' History of the World Part I. Like, when they encounter Jesus or have Moses in the beginning with 15 Commandments or the Inquisition song, lol, I find that funny. But when you go down to such dysfunctional a family, and that of a priest, and the content of jokes and incidents (something about the 16 year old brother trying to have sex with his adoptive sister--something that someone was OUTRAGED about--as an example) and things like this show has--the drugs, the sex, the lesbian church secretary having sex with the priest's sister in law--that just goes to far. So far, I don't see what's so funny about the show. Maybe I'll see it on Friday when I see the show; then again, maybe I won't.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostThu Jan 12, 2006 12:07 am    

Republican_Man wrote:
(something about the 16 year old brother trying to have sex with his adoptive sister--something that someone was OUTRAGED about--as an example) and things like this show has--the drugs, the sex, the lesbian church secretary having sex with the priest's sister in law--that just goes to far.


That would be the Drama part? *shrugs* i dont know, I just stick to the sunday night fox 6-10 pm line up Its safe....


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostThu Jan 12, 2006 12:08 am    

I don't like it, and would probably discourage others from watching it, but that's about it.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostThu Jan 12, 2006 12:12 am    

Lord Borg wrote:
Republican_Man wrote:
(something about the 16 year old brother trying to have sex with his adoptive sister--something that someone was OUTRAGED about--as an example) and things like this show has--the drugs, the sex, the lesbian church secretary having sex with the priest's sister in law--that just goes to far.


That would be the Drama part? *shrugs* i dont know, I just stick to the sunday night fox 6-10 pm line up Its safe....


Both the drama and comedy And it's wrong. Plain wrong.
Yeah, I agree with Puck. My opinion may change slightly when I see it, but I won't know until then.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostThu Jan 12, 2006 9:31 am    

Republican_Man wrote:
the content of jokes and incidents (something about the 16 year old brother trying to have sex with his adoptive sister--something that someone was OUTRAGED about--as an example) and things like this show has--the drugs, the sex, the lesbian church secretary having sex with the priest's sister in law--that just goes to far.


Well, here's a perfect example as to why someone should watch it first instead of being OUTRAGED at what they read online.

The adopted son made a one-off joke to the sister about sleeping with her, since they're not blood-relations. She responded with "Ewwwww." He wasn't serious and she replied appropriately.

The lesbian secretary was the brother-in-law's company secretary, not the church's.

It's always nice to check one's facts before ranting against something.



-------signature-------

Resume your disorder.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostThu Jan 12, 2006 3:18 pm    

I expect NBC is very happy withe all the controversy. More people are gonna watch it now. If no one said anything it most likely would of been canceled.

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com