Author |
Message |
Cathexis The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001 Posts: 5901 Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:04 am Suicide & Euthanasia-Your Opinions |
|
Since we all know how fond I am of opening up the floor for discussion regarding highly controversial....and seeing as how it's been a while since I did so, I thought I'd go for it!
Do People, as Human Beings, have the Right to Die?
1. What are your opinions of/about/on suicide?
2. How do your views about the above coincide (or lack thereof) with your beliefs about Euthanasia (assisted suicide)---and what are those beliefs?
For anyone who would like the Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition of Euthanasia, here it is:
Main Entry: eu�tha�na�sia
Pronunciation: "y�-th&-'nA-zh(E-)&
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek, easy death, from euthanatos, from eu- + thanatos death -- more at THANATOS
: the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy
|
|
|
Birdy Socialist
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 13502 Location: Here.
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:32 am |
|
YAY! I love controversial discussions.
Well, as for suicide... I think that's a persons decision. Though most of the times the reason is that that person can't handle thins anymore. I think there's always a way to handle things, as long as your willing to change. Just some people are so far gone that they can't accept help anymore and they go for drastic measures. I don't dissaprove of it, I understand why people wanna do it. At one point in my life I also had that urge, luckily I didn't go through with it.
I think Euthanasia is a good thing. A good thing, for people who are suffering and are in their final stages of a desease. In the Netherlands there's also a discussion going about whether a person can have mental unbearable suffering. I think that can be the case, but it has to be diagnosed and looked after carefully.
Naturally, euthanasia should be performed by skilled doctors, with consent of the patient, and if that patient can't decide, than the doctors must have consent of the family.
-------signature-------
Nosce te ipsum
|
|
|
Seven of Nine Sammie's Mammy
Joined: 16 Jun 2001 Posts: 7871 Location: North East England
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:43 am |
|
I don't feel ready to answer the question on suicide, due to personal reasons, and not wanting to be banned from the forum (again ). I will answer the question on euthanasia though.
Right then... for euthanasia, I think that it can be acceptable, if the person being killed wants it, has no hope of a decent quality of life, and the only other option is living a life in pain and without dignity. We allow dogs and cats that are in pain to be relieved of thier suffering, why not humans? It would have to be monitored closely, and the same ruling for abortion should apply for euthanasia (two doctors must give consent, counselling must be provided before it can go ahead).
Currently, there is an advanced directive, which allows you to state that you do not wish to be kept alive artificially if something goes wrong/are seriously ill/are in a lot of pain. I guess it might be possible to extend that to say that you would like to be helped to die if there was no chance of recovery, and that you were in a lot of pain. However, there has to be safeguards to ensure that people are not killed without their consent.
|
|
|
Brightstar82 Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 4394 Location: A Borg Cube....Where Else?
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:31 am |
|
I think euthanasia is good if the person is terminally ill with like cancer or other diseases that arnt going to get any better. My father was in the hospital for a really long time dieing of lung cancer and the people at the hospital were giving him mass doses of Morphene (a narcotic pain killer) which eventually stopped his heart. So that was Euthanasia because he was sick and not getting any better. So ya I think its ok when people are suffering and not getting any better.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:42 am |
|
Don't even want to get me started on this lol.
When people can't handle things, instead of getting help they kill themselves. When there is a better way than killing themselves. In my opinion, I wouldn't kill myself fear of going to hell.
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:44 am |
|
1. My opinion on suicide that its a waste of life. SOmeone should never commit suicide and every other person should try and stop him/her from doing so.
2. They coincide just perfectly. A person not able too live is dead and relatives with the opinion of 2 doctors have the right to terminate their lifeforce. Its not just about ethnics or mercy, its about humane decisions, rational thinking and freedom.
Like the dictionary says: "Hopelessly" sick.
Its done to animals all the time, why not humans? Why not i ask you?
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:38 am |
|
Moved to WN. This topic will be closely monitored, especially given that we have the rule that there will be no mention of suicide in any topic?
Thanks
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
oberon Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 106
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:05 pm |
|
Suicide, in my opinion is never a good solution to one's problems. Things usually can be sorted out but it's a final decision when someone kills themself; it can never be retracted.
As for euthanasia, I think that if someone is ill beyond repair and wishes to 'end it quickly' so to speak, then it's acceptable (only my opinion). If their family and friends agree and know it's going to happen and is in accordance with the desire of the patient, then it should be allowed. Living, waiting to die in excruciating pain, I'm sure isn't something anyone wants to endure.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:08 pm |
|
Both suicide and euthanasia are morally unacceptable. Suicide is wrong, and allowing someone to go foward with it is also wrong, and unacceptable.
Euthanasia, at the same time, is wrong in all cases. Human life must be preserved, and allowing someone to die, assisting in it, and making that choice are wrong. Any act (or omission) that causes death in order to eliminate suffering is a murderous act, and cannot be accepted in our society. However, refusing dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate procedures to extend life can be accepted, because in this case, one does not intend to cause death. One's inability to impede death is merely accepted.
|
|
|
teya Commander
Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Posts: 423
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:28 pm |
|
Puck wrote: | Any act (or omission) that causes death in order to eliminate suffering is a murderous act, and cannot be accepted in our society. |
By your stringent definition, then giving morphine to terminally ill people for pain control would be a murderous act, because morphine depresses the respiratory center and can lead to respiratory arrest.
Would you rather a person have a life shortened by a matter of days and live those days pain-free, or extended by a few days and live them out screaming in pain?
-------signature-------
Resume your disorder.
|
|
|
Arellia The Quiet One
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 4425 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:38 pm |
|
On suicide, personally I don't see it as an option because I have this stubborn belief that there's always hope for something better (That darn hope just won't go away!). I would disuade people from suicide in favor of a better option, but if someone really wants to end their life, well then, I wish them luck in the next one. I'm just to the side of neutral on the topic.
As for euthenasia, I would only support it if the victim has made clear their wishes and has thought it out. People should have the right to request their suffering be ended smoothly and with dignity. I would even consider it for myself under the proper conditions.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:46 pm |
|
teya wrote: | Puck wrote: | Any act (or omission) that causes death in order to eliminate suffering is a murderous act, and cannot be accepted in our society. |
By your stringent definition, then giving morphine to terminally ill people for pain control would be a murderous act, because morphine depresses the respiratory center and can lead to respiratory arrest.
Would you rather a person have a life shortened by a matter of days and live those days pain-free, or extended by a few days and live them out screaming in pain? |
Quote: | However, refusing dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate procedures to extend life can be accepted, because in this case, one does not intend to cause death. One's inability to impede death is merely accepted. |
Expanding on this thought, the use of pain killers, or other medication to alleviate the suffering of the dying although it may shorten their life, can be morally acceptable if death is not willed as either an end or a means, but only foreseen and tolerated as inevitable.
As I am sure we realize, every case where euthanasia is felt to be an option is different, and must be looked at specifically with regards to the individuals condition. Although one can't clearly outline every case in a few paragraphs, these are the guidelines that everyone should follow.
|
|
|
Jeff Miller Fleet Admiral
Joined: 22 Nov 2001 Posts: 23947 Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:21 pm |
|
Why is suicide (SP) wrong? I mean it isn't like the human race is going to die out. if a person decides to end it. I personally think since we have free will we should have the right to end our lives if we see fit.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:36 pm |
|
I don't agree with suicide at all. It's a cowardly and self-centered act.
On euthanasia, if a person is in extreme pain and has no chance of getting better, I don't think that I or anybody else should have the right to tell them that they have to suffer through that pain until they die due to my "moral standards."
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:37 pm |
|
I have NO belief in the "right to die" movement. Euthanasia and suicide in ALL its forms should be illegalized, except in very extreme circumstances (for euthanasia). It demeens life and everything. It's just not right. If the person's a vegetable, that would probably be the only exception. If you have cancer and are told that you will die in two months, though, or something like that, no. Just no.
That's my position. Feel free to disagree.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:40 pm |
|
Jeff Miller wrote: | Why is suicide (SP) wrong? I mean it isn't like the human race is going to die out. if a person decides to end it. I personally think since we have free will we should have the right to end our lives if we see fit. |
Just because you have free will does not make it right, nor does it make it acceptable. Suicide is morally wrong, and we should not have a society that promotes freedom to die. Allowing, or accepting suicide would be terrible for society as a whole because it so strongly devalues human life, and human dignity-which is simply unacceptable. There are no exceptions.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:42 pm |
|
It completely destroys the purpose to life, and demeans it. If you have the "right to die," then what meaning does life has? Is there any importance to it anymore?
If we increase our current culture of death to legalizing suicide, that could only lead to more detrminental things and entirely diminish the sanctity of human life and just demean it, period.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Valathous The Canadian, eh
Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 19074 Location: Centre Bell
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:54 pm |
|
Suicide is actually legal in Canada while attempted suicide is illegal. You may think that that's stupid but really it makes sense. If you actually go through with it, it doesn't matter how illegal it is, you're dead already. What are they going to do? Throw a corpse in jail? lol
Anyways, I think there are much better ways to solve things than to go out and kill one's self. It's not really a right or lack of right on suicide. If someone's gonna do it, they're gonna do it. Whatever.
I think euthanasia is right in certain situations. It would have to be closely monitored to ensure that people did not abuse this. It's either Oregon or the Netherlands that has the "euthanise me" cards. That could be a good system. Each card having a list of conditions where the person would agree to be euthanised, etc. It all comes down to the fact that it's their life really. Why should someone else control it?
Frankly, I think I'd use all my determination I could to recover. You'd be surprised how much being stubborn can help if you refuse to succum to death from a sickness. But if someone didn't want to have to fight the pain, they should have the right to go down nicely.
|
|
|
Starbuck faster...
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 8715 Location: between chaos and melody
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:55 pm |
|
Euthanasia
I used to think that euthanasia was wrong and cruel. Then I thought about how much pain my cat was in when we put her to sleep, and what would happen if one of my relatives was in that much pain. Would I just let them suffer? I think euthanasia is completely humane, and it's a very respectable solution to the alternative.
Suicide
Suicide is pure cowardice. I agree with Aaron 100% its cowardly and self centered. But you have to wonder how many people accidentally committed suicide, because they didn't think it would kill them, and they only wanted mommy or daddy's attention.
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:58 pm |
|
Suicide: I don't think it is a good option, but are we going to tell people that they can't die at their own will? It may not be one person's preferance, but it doesn't give them the right to control anothers actions. I think that the best option for someone feeling suicidle would be some counselling and a chance to get away for a little while, then come back slowly and kind of start over. But that can't always happen, and I am not going to tell someone that it is illegal for them to kill themselves, no matter how cowardly, self-centered, or immoral it may be.
Euthanasia: I think the first step here is to strongly encourage everyone to have a living will. It is a choice that is made for medical reasons for people who are terminally ill or will never recover (comas/vegitative state). If one does not have a living will than if the majority of family and two doctors believe it is the right thing, than it is acceptable. The exception being if there is a disconnect between the patient and another relative. Example: I have a friend with multiple personalities, her mother is a major component of this. She's looking at getting a restraing order against her mother because the mom won't leave her alone and thinks she 'knows what's best'.
That's my opinion, I know it may not be a popular one
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:25 pm |
|
For those of you who say it is their 'right' to die, and that it should be legal and/or accepted, what is that telling the person who is suicidal? That in fact, you really don't value their life either, so just go ahead? That is the last thing that they should be told if they're thinking of taking their life. We must not create a society that permits people to accept or promote death. As I have said previously, we can simply not allow human life to be devalued in this manner. We must help those who are suicidal in any manner possible, and we must show them they their life is valued. Yet, we can not allow suicide.
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:05 pm |
|
But what does it say about our society if we are telling these people that they can't control their own lives?
I don't belive suicide is a reasonable decision, by any means. But how can we tell people that just because we think it's wrong that they can't? They aren't harming anyone, they aren't committing a felony, they are simply making a choice about how they want to live. We've made it until 2006 without needing to put it into law that it's dumb. I think (hope that) the fact that it is a social discrace will ward off some people. That and I hope that people close enought to a person thinking about it will quietly try and talk them out of it.
There is no need to make a national issue out of this, it is a very peronal decision. Not a good one, not a smart one, not a respectful one, but it is a decision.
Really, if we're going to ban suicide, can we ban smoking as well? That certainly seems like a slow suicide to me.
|
|
|
teya Commander
Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Posts: 423
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:34 pm |
|
Republican_Man wrote: | I have NO belief in the "right to die" movement. Euthanasia and suicide in ALL its forms should be illegalized, except in very extreme circumstances (for euthanasia). It demeens life and everything. It's just not right. If the person's a vegetable, that would probably be the only exception. If you have cancer and are told that you will die in two months, though, or something like that, no. Just no.
That's my position. Feel free to disagree. |
Again, there are more gray areas than you're accounting for.
Euthanasia can be passive or active. In "active euthanasia," another person physically causes the death of another (e.g. drugs, a pillow over the face, etc). This is completely illegal, and I see no indications that that will change.
In "passive euthanasia," nothing directly is done--the patient may die of an overdose of morphine given to relieve pain, for example. The intent of the morphine is to relieve pain, not to cause death--even though at high doses, death is a likely outcome.
Passive euthanasia can also include the right to refuse treatment, when the patient knows that the end result will be death. This is legal in the US, and damn well better stay that way.
Now, refusing treatment can also be considered passive suicide. When my sweetie was on dialysis, he said that there were a number of patients who just got tired of it, and stopped going in. Within a week, they were dead. Again, this is the patient's right under our law, and damn well had better not change.
-------signature-------
Resume your disorder.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:37 pm |
|
I'll let Puck respond more to you guys, because I'm just not in the mood to debate today (oddly), but I just want to say that I'm fine with refusing treatment. It's the other things that concern me, like being giving a slow-killing drug or something like that. If you don't want treatment, no one should force you to do it.
But encouraging suicide by legalizing it, or legalizing actual euthanasia (beyond not accepting treatment), is just wrong, immoral, and demeans human life.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
AndrewBullock The Misguided One
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Posts: 2112 Location: Kentucky. (North America)
|
Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:46 pm |
|
Suicide is moraly wrong, but then again, not many people have morals these days. Some of you call it a selfish act, yet you don't understand what others experiance. Say you were beaten most of your life. Say you've been locked away in a basement most of your life. Or say you've lost your whole family in a fire when you were out with friends. You can't judge something you don't understand... the feeling is... well it's unbearable to experiance. However, for the majority, I think we should at least try to help someone if they say they are going to kill their self. If we've no luck, at least we've tried to help them. It's in the people we'd suspect the least... it makes me a little disapointed though that some would think it's a selfish act or even find it funny that someone wants to kill themself... Have you not considered it's a medical issue? That it isn't a selfish act? Hell, some people with healthy brain chemestry might not even think of suicide... you can't rule out anything untill you know the truth...
Last edited by AndrewBullock on Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|