Friendly Star Trek Discussions Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:43 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Serenity (2005) - Firefly Movie
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Scifi, Fantasy, and Drama This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Morphy
Forum Ogre


Joined: 15 Jun 2001
Posts: 3858

PostThu Sep 29, 2005 5:53 am    Serenity (2005) - Firefly Movie

IMDb: Serenity (2005)


It opens Friday, September 30th, 2005. Only ONE MORE DAY guys! Go see it. Previewers have given it a rating of 8.4/10 on IMDb. That's pretty high for IMDb.

Firefly is still one of my favorite Sci-Fi series even though it was wrongfully shorten by Fox. I will be in a theater watching Serenity tomorrow.


Last edited by Morphy on Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:28 am; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostThu Sep 29, 2005 2:26 pm    

w00t! Everyone should go see it

I got luck y and I get to go see a preview of it tonight ^.^

*does a little dance*

I can't wait!


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostFri Sep 30, 2005 9:10 pm    

Just saw it. It was awesome! I have some pretty harsh criticism about a few parts, but overall it was a great movie, by far one of the best cinema experiences I've had in a while.

Spoiler warnings (yes, people die)

Tachyon wrote:
The movie was paced very well, there was plenty of action in the beginning and end, although the middle dragged just a little. Each character also got their bit of the action, and of course, River gets a lot of action. I'm rather disappointed with the smaller parts that Inara and the Shepard get, especially the latter fellow, but at least he had some great lines. The characterisation was good too, all the actors slid back into their roles very naturally.

The "Mr. Universe" character seemed a bit of a gimmick to me, perhaps even a deus ex machina, which is uncharacteristic of the Firefly motif. He's a little too sudden and a little too pivotal to the plot for my tastes.

Wash's death was quite dramatic and meaningful. Apparently, he's the character with whom I identify the most, and I do love his dinosaurs. The people at the theatre (and it was pretty crowded) literally gasped when he died, because it came out of nowhere. I was so saddened that I had to go to the washroom. When I came back, they were getting ready for the dramatic fight scene where Simon and Kaylee would get to be romantic and then River could save the day.

As usually, it's the actors and the characters who drive this movie. I can't complain, the dialogue and the delivery is pure Firefly and great to see. My dad, who has not seen an episode of Firefly, said the movie was "great," and he is very critical of movies. I was surprised by the turnout, but one of the unique things about Firefly is that, even though it's science fiction, it doesn't focus on the science part of the fiction, it focuses on the humanity (similar in the way that the new BSG does), which helps it draw in a much larger audience.

Now I hope they just don't make a sequel. . . . .


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostFri Sep 30, 2005 10:11 pm    

Very nice review.

I have now seen it twice, and can honestly say that it's better the second time you see it because you notice so much more. First time I was simply awed, second time I was flat out impressed.

Acting: As usual, superb (but I do agree with you on the screentime)

Dialouge: Pure Firefly ("Dear Buddah, I'd like a pony and plastic rocket" -Mal (this one was in the ads:)))

Action: Not too overdone, had a purpouse, and was excellently coordinated.

And yes, I gasped too *sob*

As for a sequel: I do hope they make one. Mostly because they did leave threads hanging, and I don't think Joss Whedon will loose energy or passion for the series. Also, the deal is, if they make $40million (I think) they make a trilogy


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostFri Sep 30, 2005 11:49 pm    

TrekkieMage wrote:
As for a sequel: I do hope they make one. Mostly because they did leave threads hanging, and I don't think Joss Whedon will loose energy or passion for the series. Also, the deal is, if they make $40million (I think) they make a trilogy

I'm worried that a sequel would cheapen the significance of the first movie, especially with the events in this one. If he did decide to make one one, I hope that it is motivated because a story does exist, not just for money.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
myblackrose
Commander


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 474
Location: Floating around...

PostSat Oct 01, 2005 11:58 am    

I haven't seen Serenity yet but I've been watching Firefly on the sci fi channel... its absolutely awesome!!! What idiot cancelled it? Every episode is sheer brilliance... and so damn funny! I'm gonna see Serenity as soon as I can...

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSat Oct 01, 2005 12:11 pm    

^ Fox.

Hitchhiker: I think that he only does jobs that he is really passionate about. I could be mistaken, but that's my impression.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostSat Oct 01, 2005 6:15 pm    

Well, since the other thread was locked, I'll post in this one. Missed seeing it somehow when I looked.

Great movie overall. A few minor nits.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 9:02 am    

Lindley wrote:
Great movie overall. A few minor nits.


What were the nitpicks?


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 12:35 pm    

Score could have been stronger, for one.

Jewel Staite looked unnaturally skinny in most scenes. I get that she's naturally thin, but I kept getting the impression her head was going to fall right off her shoulders.

Simon didn't feel quite right. Not bad, just a little off.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 4:22 pm    

Good points. But overall, the movie still kicked butt. Especially if those are the only three things that strike you as off.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 4:29 pm    

Lindley wrote:
Jewel Staite looked unnaturally skinny in most scenes. I get that she's naturally thin, but I kept getting the impression her head was going to fall right off her shoulders.

I thought there was something wrong with the resolution or something, because the entire screen looked a bit squished horizontally.
Lindley wrote:
Simon didn't feel quite right. Not bad, just a little off.

He was too assertive.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 4:31 pm    

^Lol! Yeah, he seemed very confrontational ("And that's final!" )

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 7:32 pm    

I thought it was a good movie. I didn't see the point of killing off two of the main cast, though.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 7:46 pm    

^ It's Joss Whedon. It's gotta be a shocker. Besides (SPOILERS):

Quote:
I think that the actor who played Book is getting tired, you could kind of see it in the movie. I don't think he wanted to do a trilogy, which is a possiblility if the movie grosses enough. And the guy who played Wash is currently in a play (maybe Broadway) and is really busy. He may not have the time to do a trilogy. Plus, in Whedon's TV world there is no such thing as a happy relationship - just look at Buffy and Angel.


So yeah...He had his reasons probably


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 7:53 pm    

Well, if the actual actors don't want to do more than one movie, I can understand it. Otherwise, it just seems like a waste.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 8:24 pm    

Movie was way over rated imo, bassed on a minor tv series. I would rather watch Into the Blue also in theaters, give it 4 weeks this movie will pass into history like many movies of this last summer: Episode 3, Batman Begins, Fantastic 4, XxX: State of the union, Herbie Reloaded, Hitch Hikers guide to the universe and god forbid The Island. I think Hollywood should make better movies. like they did back in the 80's if they don't I see the downfall in their future.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun Oct 02, 2005 8:32 pm    

^Have you actually seen it?

I've seen it and I don't think it's overrated. It's one of the few movies that produced this year that is original, funny, and talented.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 10:24 am    

No, I haven't but look at the movies that came out this year that I mentioned Hell they expected Episode 3 to be a huge block buster that riviled the Batman movie in 89 and on scale with the first robocop movie in the mid 80's. I see them over hyping this movie and it reminds me of episode 3 and its lack of success. The 89 batman and the first robocop movie were not that acclaimed before they came out and they were huge. I hope I'm making some sense, I see it as this: Over hyping a movie = failure. Little fanfare = success.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 3:47 pm    

This one has actually earned its hype. Go see it

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 4:03 pm    

Jeff Miller wrote:
Movie was way over rated imo, bassed on a minor tv series. I would rather watch Into the Blue also in theaters, give it 4 weeks this movie will pass into history like many movies of this last summer: Episode 3, Batman Begins, Fantastic 4, XxX: State of the union, Herbie Reloaded, Hitch Hikers guide to the universe and god forbid The Island. I think Hollywood should make better movies. like they did back in the 80's if they don't I see the downfall in their future.


Obviously there wasn't enough "hype" on that one.

Don't know if I'll see this yet. Though if Morphy likes it,



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 4:22 pm    

^ Lol!

It's really amazing, you should go see it T


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 5:00 pm    

Jeff Miller wrote:
No, I haven't but look at the movies that came out this year that I mentioned Hell they expected Episode 3 to be a huge block buster that riviled the Batman movie in 89 and on scale with the first robocop movie in the mid 80's. I see them over hyping this movie and it reminds me of episode 3 and its lack of success. The 89 batman and the first robocop movie were not that acclaimed before they came out and they were huge. I hope I'm making some sense, I see it as this: Over hyping a movie = failure. Little fanfare = success.


Creatively, this movie is definitely a success.

Now, financially? We'll have to wait and see on that. It's a little below where it might be at the moment in terms of box office.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 6:06 pm    

Hopefully once realize people realize that all of the hype it's getting is actually earned they'll go see it

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
The Delta Flyer
Commodore


Joined: 08 Apr 2002
Posts: 2163
Location: East Yorkshire

PostMon Oct 03, 2005 9:12 pm    

It will be the greatest injustice if this film doesn't get the recognition it deserves!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2, 3  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com