Friendly Star Trek Discussions Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:58 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Food for thought.
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Ntypical
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 136
Location: North Carolina

PostMon Mar 16, 2009 2:47 pm    Food for thought.

MOSCOW -- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.
Igor Panarin

In recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger."

Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.
But it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.

A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.
"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.
In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker. During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.

Mr. Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet Union."
Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr. Panarin's theories don't hold water.

Mr. Panarin's r�sum� includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.

The professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics, and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."
In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.

"When I pushed the button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated, hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."

At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.
He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.
"It would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly grin.
Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's role as a global financial regulator.
Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."
The article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof. Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.

For Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to very carefully," he says.

The professor says he's convinced that people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.



View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostTue Mar 17, 2009 4:41 pm    

I've heard about him off and on for the last few months. I don't see his ideas as very likely. For one, the majority of the US (particularly its young people) express general apathy and inability to physically come together--there are plenty of great blogs, very few great protests. However apathetic, the US has a well-equipped military and would never consent to being broken up. While I do think that divisions in this county may eventually come to a head, I think things would have to get a lot worse. End of 2010? ... no.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Ntypical
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 136
Location: North Carolina

PostTue Mar 17, 2009 6:14 pm    

Actually. Of my buddies, and as a former service member, most would likely choose the side that actually supports the Constitution.

Ya see, those in the military are not as dumb as many liberals believe and we take our oath seriously.

If things continue down the path they are on, then more and more will speak out, when their cries are not heard it will escalate.

2+ million troops can not secure a landmass the size of the U.S. with a pop of over 300 million, especially with nearly one third of them own arms.

Many of the things that are happening now are the same things that set off the war for independence two hundred and some years ago.

I pray the day never comes. But if the Gov does not start to listen, then things will start to escalate.


View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostTue Mar 17, 2009 9:50 pm    

People in the US are so apathetic because, relatively speaking, most of us have an extremely high quality of living. (Despite the fact that Congress is a joke and the President at any given moment is disliked by about half of the country.) To see something like this happen, the United States would have to see an EXTREME decline in our economy-enough to cause rioting and unrest. I just don't see that in our future.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostWed Mar 18, 2009 10:11 am    

Ntypical wrote:
Actually. Of my buddies, and as a former service member, most would likely choose the side that actually supports the Constitution.

Ya see, those in the military are not as dumb as many liberals believe and we take our oath seriously.

If things continue down the path they are on, then more and more will speak out, when their cries are not heard it will escalate.

2+ million troops can not secure a landmass the size of the U.S. with a pop of over 300 million, especially with nearly one third of them own arms.

Many of the things that are happening now are the same things that set off the war for independence two hundred and some years ago.

I pray the day never comes. But if the Gov does not start to listen, then things will start to escalate.


Hello, darling? I was a military wife only a year ago, until my husband was discharged. Don't try to sell me on the idea that all people in the military somehow agree with you. Of my buddies, still in the military mind you, they're perfectly fine with what's happening right now. Even the conservative ones aren't ready to ditch the commander in chief just because he disagrees with them. Come on. There is no generalizing the military, so please, don't try. You have your friends and I have mine, and they obviously don't agree, despite being in the same profession. Just like how I know doctors who are for, and doctors who are against universal health insurance. This is a poor argument to try to make.

And to Puck, I absolutely agree with you on all points. And... I don't see our quality of life in that kind of decline just yet. Hopefully I never will.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Ntypical
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 136
Location: North Carolina

PostWed Mar 18, 2009 10:19 am    

I did not say all. I said most of the ones I know. And I also did not say that they would be the ones rising up against him.

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostWed Mar 18, 2009 5:21 pm    

Arellia wrote:
And to Puck, I absolutely agree with you on all points. And... I don't see our quality of life in that kind of decline just yet. Hopefully I never will.


It must be a Christmas miracle .

Shall I break out some champagne?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com