Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:53 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Did you think Janeway was a good captain?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Voyager This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Did you think Janeway was a good captain?
Yes
77%
 77%  [ 24 ]
No
16%
 16%  [ 5 ]
Indifferent
6%
 6%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 31

Author Message
Kathryn_Janeway218
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 252
Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)

PostFri Mar 21, 2008 11:53 pm    Did you think Janeway was a good captain?

Was Janeway a good captain? Was she a bad captain? Or do feel indiferent about her being good or bad. Please give your reasons for choosing your answer.


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Syzygy
Senior Cadet


Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Location: Starfleet Academy

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 12:02 am    

I liked Janeway, but I sometimes wished the scripts had her as more consistent.

Ultimately, I concluded that how she saw herself as Captain, and what kind of Captain she actually was were not in sync.

I think she liked to think of herself as a by-the-book Captain, much like her mentor Admiral Paris. But in reality, she was more of a female swashbuckler, much like the improvisational James T. Kirk.

This isn't so bad. Many of us see ourselves differently than we actually are.

Anyway, she was an extraordinary leader and diplomat, and a daring tactician, both in battle, as an explorer, and interpersonally (taking risks with the Maquis, Kes, Seven, etc).

I would happily serve under Janeway...although I might occasionally wish for someone who took less chances.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kathryn_Janeway218
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 252
Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 12:08 am    

I would have to say that was a really good answer. I thought Janeway was a good captain. She did take too many chances though. That could get annoying.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
squiggy
Stooge Two


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 3007
Location: Messing with the fabric of Video Game realities. I'll summon Shiva on you! I SWEAR!

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 6:09 am    

Syzygy wrote:
I liked Janeway, but I sometimes wished the scripts had her as more consistent.

Ultimately, I concluded that how she saw herself as Captain, and what kind of Captain she actually was were not in sync.

I think she liked to think of herself as a by-the-book Captain, much like her mentor Admiral Paris. But in reality, she was more of a female swashbuckler, much like the improvisational James T. Kirk.

This isn't so bad. Many of us see ourselves differently than we actually are.

Anyway, she was an extraordinary leader and diplomat, and a daring tactician, both in battle, as an explorer, and interpersonally (taking risks with the Maquis, Kes, Seven, etc).

I would happily serve under Janeway...although I might occasionally wish for someone who took less chances.

I'm with you on that. I'd like to know who voted 'no', and why they voted that way. I thought the point of this topic was to explain your' vote.

I should also point out that unlike Captain Baldy, Captain Janeway had an aesthetically pleasing feature as well.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Thomas
Pool Princess


Joined: 08 Jul 2001
Posts: 19730
Location: Manchester

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 10:11 am    

[Moved from GSTD to VOY]


-------signature-------

Gloss rhymes with hair!

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
bigcobra
Junior Cadet


Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 19

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 10:50 am    

out of all the captains, she irritated me the most. she was such a hypocrite. how many times did she violate the prime directive? she got them stranded in the Delta Quadrant to begin with. and she had the nerve to imprison Tom Paris for a month. Plus Kate Mulgrew uses her hands too much while acting.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
squiggy
Stooge Two


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 3007
Location: Messing with the fabric of Video Game realities. I'll summon Shiva on you! I SWEAR!

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 5:57 pm    

bigcobra wrote:
out of all the captains, she irritated me the most. she was such a hypocrite. how many times did she violate the prime directive? she got them stranded in the Delta Quadrant to begin with. and she had the nerve to imprison Tom Paris for a month. Plus Kate Mulgrew uses her hands too much while acting.

But she has NICE hands! So it's all good!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 6:47 pm    

bigcobra wrote:
out of all the captains, she irritated me the most. she was such a hypocrite. how many times did she violate the prime directive? she got them stranded in the Delta Quadrant to begin with. and she had the nerve to imprison Tom Paris for a month. Plus Kate Mulgrew uses her hands too much while acting.


I agree. Captain Janeway was easily the worst captain in Starfleet/Star Trek. She was hypocritical and caused more harm then good.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Valathous
The Canadian, eh


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 19074
Location: Centre Bell

PostSat Mar 22, 2008 9:44 pm    

I voted no. As was mentioned before, she was very hypocritical. Preached the PD but broke it all the time. Her moral compass was apparently close to a high powered magnet, on top of that. Whatever suited her desires is what she went after. Rousseau wouldn't have liked her!

Not to mention her alliance with the Borg would ultimately lead to the continued assimilation of countless species, etc.

Despite the fact that she listened to Chakotay, she never listened to his suggestions. The man only captained a small ship that managed to stay alive against both the Federation and the Cardassians, but he doesn't know anything...

And she looked/sounded like a man. Cher's sister? Perhaps...


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
La Forge
Bajoran Colonel


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 2125
Location: Babylon 5

PostSun Mar 23, 2008 8:24 pm    

The worst captain seen on Trek, by far. Worse than that one guy who did that one bad thing. Y'know, that guy? Yeah, him.

Firstly, as the two above me pointed out, Janeway was a hypocrite... a major one. At the start of the show, she saw it as so important to save the Ocampans... over saving her own crew? What the heck? Alright, so, she screws her entire crew to save a bunch of short-lived pixies, whatever. She did the 'noble' thing (in her eyes anyways). But, then, at the end of the series, future self is willing to scribble all over the Prime Directive with a rainbow-colored crayon to get her crew home faster? And, why exactly did she chose to bring her crew home after seven years? Why not bring them home after the first year? Or, how 'bout not let them get lost at all? Crazy future Janeway.

And, then there was the fact that she wasn't a true captain. She hardly ever listened to her sensible first officer, Chakotay. And, not to mention, in Year of Hell, when the Doctor cited Starfleet law, stating that he was, as the CMO, allowed to remove her from duty because she was, well, unfit for duty... she flat-out ignored the man. Some captain...

And, lastly, the worst offense... she sounded like a robot.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostSun Mar 23, 2008 8:49 pm    

La Forge wrote:


And, then there was the fact that she wasn't a true captain. She hardly ever listened to her sensible first officer, Chakotay. And, not to mention, in Year of Hell, when the Doctor cited Starfleet law, stating that he was, as the CMO, allowed to remove her from duty because she was, well, unfit for duty... she flat-out ignored the man. Some captain...


Well, to be fair, there was like, five other people on the ship at the time, and it was getting pounded to oblivion for nearly a year. She was also wanting to find Chakotay and Kim, not a bad thing in and of itself. Despite ignoring the "law" on this point, I could forgive that. I'd hardly think Sisko or Picard would allow the CMO to order them around in the same situation. Then again, Sisko probably would have ordered the ship to go around Krenim space, so...



-------signature-------

When you cried I'd wipe away all of your tears
When you'd scream I'd fight away all of your fears
And I held your hand through all of these years
But you still have
All of me


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kathryn_Janeway218
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 252
Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)

PostMon Mar 24, 2008 9:33 pm    

You have to give her some credit, she did get her ship home after seven years trapped with the same people. She also beat the Borg on many occasions. I do believe because of this that she was the best captain starfleet had to offer. Plus she got to know each and every one of the crew. Picard and sisco never did that.


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Valathous
The Canadian, eh


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 19074
Location: Centre Bell

PostMon Mar 24, 2008 9:40 pm    

She had no choice but to know most of the crew, they were the only people from the Federation there (with the exception of a few random events). The writers definitely overdid the Borg in VOY. No way an Intrepid Class ship should have been able to handle the Borg so often, and I don't care who the captain is. It's a scouting vessel. Writers screwed the pooch there.

Also, there's a reason why:

A) Picard is the Captain of the Federation Flagship.
B) Why Sisko was, for all intents and purposes, the go to guy in the Dominion War.

Why? Because they were far superior captains in both diplomatic and tactical scenarios.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Kathryn_Janeway218
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 252
Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)

PostMon Mar 24, 2008 10:06 pm    

Yes, but did they have to deal with everything that Janeway did? No. They didn't have to deal with the kazon or the krenim, but they did have their own uniqe chalenges.


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Valathous
The Canadian, eh


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 19074
Location: Centre Bell

PostMon Mar 24, 2008 10:25 pm    

LOL, Kazon vs. the Ent-E or Defiant would be no match, especially given the tactical knowledge of Picard and Sisko. The Krenim are tricky, but in the end Janeway died. She just managed to hit the reset button in the process.

On the flip side, Janeway escaped from having to deal with the Dominion. I can just see it now... "There's coffee in the nebula!"

...*Dominion*

Owned.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Syzygy
Senior Cadet


Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Location: Starfleet Academy

PostTue Mar 25, 2008 1:51 am    

Valathous wrote:
Why Sisko was, for all intents and purposes, the go to guy in the Dominion War.

Why? Because they were far superior captains in both diplomatic and tactical scenarios.


Sisko wasn't assigned to DS9 to fight the Dominion War. He was assigned to a minor, alien station in an alien "backwater" area of space.

By a fluke, the Bajoran wormhole opened up, and suddenly, DS9 became one of the most important places in known space.

I agree he was a fantastic leader. But it was already his command when the Dominion War started. Starfleet Command didn't put him there for that reason.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Valathous
The Canadian, eh


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 19074
Location: Centre Bell

PostTue Mar 25, 2008 11:47 am    

Yes, but Admiral Ross put him in charge of the fleets in season 6. Back in season 4 he went to Earth to be in charge of Starfleet Security for a while to combat the Dominion threat on Earth.

He may have started out just being assigned to a backwater station, but his leadership and tactical abilities kept him there in the thick of things and made him the face of the Federation in the Dominion War. If he was horrible, they wouldn't have left him there, they'd have put in someone more capable.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Kathryn_Janeway218
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 252
Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)

PostTue Mar 25, 2008 2:03 pm    

But they must have thought that Janeway was very capable to put a brand new captain in charge of a brand new high tech ship. I am not saying that Sisco and Picard were bad captains, I just think Janeway was better. Picard was too old school, and Sisco was over dramatic.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
luit14
Commodore


Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 2232
Location: Come on in HEEERE! :P

PostTue Mar 25, 2008 6:10 pm    

Yes, I think she was a good captain overall. But she is definitely the worst captain at dealing with security situations. There are so many times that she let a problem get out of control when she could have easily stopped it. One example that comes to my mind is from "Hope and Fear" when she sends a security team to get the guy when she could have just beamed him aboard Voyager to the brig.... and on and on.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
lifeguide
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 132
Location: AUSTRALIA

PostTue Mar 25, 2008 8:41 pm    

I have stated in the past on other threads that she was most certainly a hypocrite and therefore I would not have liked to be serving under a captain like that.

However a captain of starship has one overall primary goal, whther they are in the gamma, delta, beta or alpha quadrant, and that is they must ensure the saffety and security of their crew at all times.

As willing to turn her back on the PD as she was, she did get most of her crew home, she set up a foothold in the delta quadrant for the federation (Ambassador Neelix), and due to the long range communication and propulsion experiences there was a huge leap forward in technology which will be of great benefit to the federation in the future.

Okay so some battles may of resulted in "forced outcomes" but she did get her crew home and did in 7 years what only the Equinox had done previously, explore unexplored section of the galaxy.

The question here should of been seperated, What made Janeway a bad captain?

And what made her a good captain?

Both words could be used to describe her.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Mar 25, 2008 11:17 pm    

Kathryn_Janeway218 wrote:
But they must have thought that Janeway was very capable to put a brand new captain in charge of a brand new high tech ship. I am not saying that Sisco and Picard were bad captains, I just think Janeway was better. Picard was too old school, and Sisco was over dramatic.


High-tech ship? All it had was bio-neural gel packs. It wasn't particularly high-tech. Not to mention, her mission would have been small, cheap missions like finding the Maquis. Picard got the flagship and Sisko got one of the most powerful warships in all of Starfleet history. Not to mention neither of them got their crew stuck in another quadrant. In what way is she better?

lifeguide wrote:
I have stated in the past on other threads that she was most certainly a hypocrite and therefore I would not have liked to be serving under a captain like that.

Agreed.

However a captain of starship has one overall primary goal, whther they are in the gamma, delta, beta or alpha quadrant, and that is they must ensure the saffety and security of their crew at all times.

True.

As willing to turn her back on the PD as she was, she did get most of her crew home, she set up a foothold in the delta quadrant for the federation (Ambassador Neelix), and due to the long range communication and propulsion experiences there was a huge leap forward in technology which will be of great benefit to the federation in the future.

She did get her crew home, but at the expense of others, including some of her own crew. Counter-productive no? Set a foothold? Neelix did that, not Janeway. All the technology that came from the crew's journey there was never from Janeway herself, but the ingenuity of her crew. You give credit to her, but she did very little.

Okay so some battles may of resulted in "forced outcomes" but she did get her crew home and did in 7 years what only the Equinox had done previously, explore unexplored section of the galaxy.

She got her crew home at the expense of a future that was already written. She undid it to save only a few select officers she liked.

The question here should of been seperated, What made Janeway a bad captain?

Hypocrisy, murder, unraveling time, etc.

And what made her a good captain?

She made her crew look good?

Both words could be used to describe her.


How so?


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Debra
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 26 May 2007
Posts: 444

PostWed Mar 26, 2008 4:15 pm    

She is a good captain, but she had her bad points... all captains do....

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
squiggy
Stooge Two


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 3007
Location: Messing with the fabric of Video Game realities. I'll summon Shiva on you! I SWEAR!

PostWed Mar 26, 2008 4:49 pm    

Debra wrote:
She is a good captain, but she had her bad points... all captains do....


Yup yup ^^
I loves her. Even though I normally hate hipocrits, I think it's just cause I know she's a fictional character. They are easy to love.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Andi McDougal
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 13 Apr 2007
Posts: 93
Location: York, PA

PostThu Mar 27, 2008 6:35 pm    

bigcobra wrote:
out of all the captains, she irritated me the most. she was such a hypocrite. how many times did she violate the prime directive? she got them stranded in the Delta Quadrant to begin with. and she had the nerve to imprison Tom Paris for a month. Plus Kate Mulgrew uses her hands too much while acting.


Stage actors do that quite a bit...she's a good stage actor too.



-------signature-------

It is a shallow life that does not give a person a few scars.
~~~Garrison Keilor

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kolbie213
Crewman


Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Location: WV

PostThu Apr 03, 2008 4:55 pm    I think Captine Janeway is cool

Captine Janeway was probably the BEST captine ever.Sorry all ya people who don't like her but that's ur opinion. I think she is totally cool PS: She ain't a hipocrit!!


-------signature-------

America.
LOL

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com