Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:27 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Social Security
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed May 23, 2007 12:53 am    Social Security

I figured this was more WN that CC.
(subject matter copied from unknown source)

Quote:
What happened with this promise?
Franklin D. Roosevelt promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent �Trust Fund" rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government Program, and,

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to "put away," you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust" fund and put it into the General fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically-controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

MY FAVORITE

A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive SSI Social Security payments!

The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Then, after doing all this lying and thieving and violation of the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is, uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve.



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostThu May 24, 2007 4:20 pm    

Personally, I'd love to see where all the data is from, I'd also love to see the voting records for it.

I'm not defending the Democratic party if they are being hypocritical about this, but I do find it strange that the Republicans weren't using it as a defence for themselves when the Dems were (and still are) attacking them about SS.

I think that both parties are responsible for it, and that no matter which one did the most damage they both need to re-evaluate it and look into reparing the system.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostThu May 24, 2007 5:55 pm    

Yay for Political slander.

I'd like to see some sources and data to back up all of that. But as a counter:



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostThu May 24, 2007 5:57 pm    

I'll agree with TrekkieMage that the blame does not rest solely with the Democrats (shame on them!). The Republicans have had 6 years to make improvements if they'd really wanted to.

However, it's also true that voters are woefully uninformed about such issues. This is in part because campaigning has become more about smear tactics than actually, say, talking about the issues. Crazy idea, I know. Sadly, most people aren't motivated enough to learn about the issues, which is why I fully support civics classes in high schools.

America, and any other democratic country, has its rights and freedoms because people fought for to secure those rights and freedoms. It is a sign of disrespect to ignore the political process and refrain from voting--essentially, you are shirking your duty as a citizen of a democratic country. Especially those people who complain about how terrible the country is. If you think that, then go vote. Maybe your selected candidate will not get elected, but at least you participated. Otherwise, democracy without participation is basically an oligarchy.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostThu May 24, 2007 6:03 pm    

Very good point about the uninformed bit. I kind of skimmed right past that...

I think the fact that American *are* so uninformed makes all these smear tactics so succesful. We pride ourselves on being educated, but we really aren't as educated as we think we are once you start looking at how gullible people can be in politics.

As for the voting, I think it would make a big difference if election day were a national holiday, unfortunetly, Congress is afraid of change that will impact who votes and most Americans don't seem to me motivated or aware enough to push them to do it.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostFri May 25, 2007 12:34 am    

I'm glad that no one took that as gospel, especially since it came with no source. I primarily agreed with what the writer was saying, that no one thinks for themselves anymore, does any investigating into anything. And that seems to be what you all got, (most of you), out of it, too.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com