What did you think of Voyager's appearance? |
Very Nice |
|
71% |
[ 27 ] |
Pretty good, but some area for improvement |
|
23% |
[ 9 ] |
Nothing Special |
|
5% |
[ 2 ] |
Redesign the whole thing |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 38 |
|
Author |
Message |
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:50 pm Did you like how the U.S.S Voyager looked? |
|
Well? Did you like the interior? Exterior? Did anyone think they could have improved somewhere?
|
|
|
craign Senior Cadet
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 20 Location: USS Voyager NCC-74656
|
Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:05 pm |
|
I loved the exterior and the bridge. The only things i didnt like much was the captains ready room, looked... bleh. It shouldve been more like the ENT D captains RR. Wood(ish) colour etc...
But thats opinion i guess...
xxCR41Gxx
|
|
|
~Voyager Fanatic~ Super Genius
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 1787
|
Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:14 am |
|
I love Voyager as it is..Borg perfection! dont change a thing...
|
|
|
StarfleetCommand74656 Captain
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 653 Location: On STV
|
Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 am |
|
Voyager is without a doubt the best ever Trek starship. Would've liked to see the Ent-E style of bridge, though. Voyagers lighting is great
|
|
|
cmdrFelix Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 30
|
Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:47 am |
|
It fits the starfleet design scheme and it is cool looking. I am a little confused on why the Captain's ready room was so huge.
|
|
|
KateReba fan Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 251 Location: BC
|
Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:00 pm |
|
I liked all of it. I think the Ready Room was good b/c when you're flying in Space and it's dark outside then you would want to counterbalance it with a light interior.
-------signature-------
�Be different, stand out, and work your butt off.� -- Reba McEntire
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:54 pm |
|
I liked all of it but it could use some more stuff added to it maybe. Not sure what. But it looked good.
|
|
|
AndrewBullock The Misguided One
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Posts: 2112 Location: Kentucky. (North America)
|
Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:30 am |
|
I love how Voyager looks. I think they did well with it's concept.
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:47 pm |
|
Overall I loved it. The outside was very sleek and functional (well, I don't know about the folding nacelles...), and the inside looked comfortable without loosing functionality.
One thing I've noticed was that the Enterprise-D was way too hotel-like (80s pink! Yay!) and that the NX-01 looked like there wasn't a comfortable place to sit...Voyager was a nice compromise
|
|
|
luit14 Commodore
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 2232 Location: Come on in HEEERE! :P
|
Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:28 pm |
|
Yeah, it's probly my favorite starfleet design on the interior that I've seen. I liked DS9 better though but it was a station.
Exterior was pretty cool too.
|
|
|
Untitled Commander
Joined: 02 Jul 2006 Posts: 396 Location: abandoned
|
Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:51 pm |
|
I liked the interior, but some one once remarked that Voyager looked like a giant spoon and I have to agree. While I think the exterior is much better than the exterior of the Enterprise (um...D is it, one from the TNG series, not the films) I think it could have been improved upon.
|
|
|
~Voyager Fanatic~ Super Genius
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 1787
|
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:03 am |
|
When I first started watching Voyager, I though it looked bizzare especially the main deflector which at that time thought it looked like a silly face but I now am able to admire Voyager's beauty and technological sophistry.
-------signature-------
Disembodiment is the epitome of perfection...
|
|
|
StarfleetCommand74656 Captain
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 653 Location: On STV
|
Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:03 pm |
|
The deflector on Voyager was the best. TNG's looked a bit ridiculous
In fact, the Ent- E had the best deflector
|
|
|
alxg101 Crewman
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 3
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:30 pm |
|
yeah i said voyager looked very nice, i think the inside more than the out... i read someones comment that said it looked a bit like a spoon, id agree i feel that voyager is a little short and stumpy and from the side looks like it has a pot belly sounds all very human i know also im not a huge fan of the moving naiselles. otherwise the interior is excellent, loved the bridge, especially the lighting and engineering, astrometrics etc are all good too. apologies for the terrible punctuation!
|
|
|
Sonic74205 Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 4081 Location: England
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:02 pm |
|
Yeah i liked the way voyager looked. I prefered the exterior to the interior though. The interior was nice don't get me wrong, very clean, simple and funtion just like you would expect from a starship. But seeing it over 7 years and imagening living there its not that nice...a bit generic. I liked the interior of the enterprise-D. Looked like a luxury liner, really gave it a sense of community.
I remember when i started watching voyager i always thought that when voyager was at impule the nacelles always looked a bit too small for the ship. But if you think about them being longer the ship looks odd lol. I prefer voyager at warp with the nacelles up, much better
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:11 pm |
|
To be honest, it's ok. People said it looks like a "spoon". I disagree, it looks more like a giant arrowhead. Honestly, that's not very appealing to me. It almost oozes "Galaxy class-lite" to me, the way Voyager looked. As if it's like a tiny, cute version of a starship. It doesn't looks horrible or anything. I mean, it certainly has a sleek look to it and I love that in starships, like the Enterprise-J.
As for the interior, no, I don't. The bridge was the only "cool" part of the interior. It seems more spatious then a Galaxy class, which is ironic what with the Intrepid class being smaller.
|
|
|
jonycold Junior Cadet
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 19
|
Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:03 pm |
|
Absolutely loved the interior, except for the shuttle bay.
about the exterior, i didn't like the view of the ship from the behind that much, but upfront it looked amazing.
i LOVED when voyager goes to warp and the warp-engines do that flip thingy!
|
|
|
Syzygy Senior Cadet
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 24 Location: Starfleet Academy
|
Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:20 pm |
|
TrekkieMage wrote: | Overall I loved it. The outside was very sleek and functional (well, I don't know about the folding nacelles...), and the inside looked comfortable without loosing functionality. |
Agree. The folding nacelles looked jarringly angular...awkward.
Originally, the ship was to have sleek, rounded nacelles more reminiscent of the Enterprise D. This is the improvement I would have made.
|
|
|
Kathryn_Janeway218 Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 252 Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)
|
Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:48 pm |
|
VOYAGER HAD THE BEST EVERYTHING!!!
|
|
|
deltaflyer3 Lieutenant
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 137
|
Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:40 pm |
|
i liked it it was a whole new design in the star trek world
|
|
|
deltaflyer3 Lieutenant
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 137
|
Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:41 pm |
|
Founder wrote: | To be honest, it's ok. People said it looks like a "spoon". I disagree, it looks more like a giant arrowhead. Honestly, that's not very appealing to me. It almost oozes "Galaxy class-lite" to me, the way Voyager looked. As if it's like a tiny, cute version of a starship. It doesn't looks horrible or anything. I mean, it certainly has a sleek look to it and I love that in starships, like the Enterprise-J.
As for the interior, no, I don't. The bridge was the only "cool" part of the interior. It seems more spatious then a Galaxy class, which is ironic what with the Intrepid class being smaller. |
i think it kinda looks like a duck at a certain angle.
-------signature-------
Warning: Last chance to be a hero Doctor, get going!
|
|
|
Spartan 688 Ensign
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 57
|
|
|
calvin Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 78 Location: SoCal
|
Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:22 pm |
|
Founder wrote: | To be honest, it's ok. People said it looks like a "spoon". I disagree, it looks more like a giant arrowhead. Honestly, that's not very appealing to me. It almost oozes "Galaxy class-lite" to me, the way Voyager looked. |
the Galaxy class doesn't have that elongated, arrowhead/spoon-like saucer section. the Galaxy class's saucer section is fatter/wider than it is long, isn't it? perhaps you were thinking of the Enterprise-E, which has an elongated saucer section, though it's more of an oval than an arrowhead.
personally i like that spoon shape saucer section. the yeager has the same look as well. both are very sleek/sexy looking.
|
|
|
vgrbabe Senior Cadet
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 20
|
Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:55 pm |
|
The Intrepid Class is still my favorite ship design. It looks so sleek and fast!
|
|
|
RobertBeltranFAN Ensign
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 58
|
Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:23 am |
|
I wouldn't change anything about Voyager because mostly everyone likes it the way it is, and it is perfect.
|
|
|
|