Author |
Message |
CJ Cregg Commodore
Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 1254
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:23 pm Judge says Saddam 'not dictator' |
|
Quote: | Judge says Saddam 'not dictator'
The chief judge in Saddam Hussein's trial has said the former Iraqi leader was not a dictator, but had only been made to seem like one by his aides.
The controversial comments come a day after Judge Abdullah al-Amiri was accused of bias towards the defence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5345112.stm |
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:25 pm |
|
Not good if he's got bias towards Saddam, especially considering these comments. He wasn't a dictator? Ridiculous.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:47 pm |
|
I'm going to go out on a limb and hope that when taking this in context, the judge meant that he wasn't a dictator in an insulting way...like he was incompetent or something. If not, then yikes.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:53 pm |
|
Looks like it wasn't the case because it looks like he was a Saddam judge (during his dictatorship, that is) and a member of the Ba'ath Party. And in the context of what he said, according to the article, it looks like he meant it, especially considering Saddam's "thank you" reply.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:53 pm |
|
Yeah he wasn't a dictator at all...
|
|
|
CJ Cregg Commodore
Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 1254
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:00 pm |
|
Well whatever the judge says you have to feel a bit sorry for him. He could be killed by Saddam loyalists for being tough or killed for being too soft.
They should have tried Saddam in the Hague.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:04 pm |
|
CJ Cregg wrote: | They should have tried Saddam in the Hague. |
I don't think they should have. The Iraqi people need to get their own justice.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
CJ Cregg Commodore
Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 1254
|
Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:06 pm |
|
Well maybe i just trust the ICJ than an Iraqi court.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:28 pm |
|
Phew. Good news.
Quote: | Iraqi State TV Reports Judge in Saddam Trial to Change
BAGHDAD, Iraq � The chief judge in Saddam Hussein's genocide trial was replaced Tuesday amid complaints from Shiite and Kurdish officials that he was too soft on the former Iraqi leader, a move that could raise accusations of government interference in the highly sensitive case.
Read more at FoxNews.com. |
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
|