Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:22 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Should we have a TOS or lost era series?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> The Future of Star Trek This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
StarfleetCommand74656
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 653
Location: On STV

PostTue Oct 03, 2006 1:27 pm    Should we have a TOS or lost era series?

I think the next Trek should be a return to the 23rd century, maybe @ SFA or a starbase or starship. I love the ST Vangurad books set in the OS era but fairly Kirk-less

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Oct 03, 2006 1:53 pm    

No...

No more going back into the past. Why don't people get this? Prequals fail. While TOS wouldn't necessarily be a prequal, but we don't want anything out of the TNG, DS9, VOY era. We want those stories continued. For over a decade, we've been in that era.

Not to mention, this topic belongs in FUTURE Star Trek section.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostTue Oct 03, 2006 8:02 pm    

Founder wrote:
No...

No more going back into the past. Why don't people get this? Prequals fail. While TOS wouldn't necessarily be a prequal, but we don't want anything out of the TNG, DS9, VOY era. We want those stories continued. For over a decade, we've been in that era.

Not to mention, this topic belongs in FUTURE Star Trek section.


Maybe not the past, but the future. A few years past the TNG/DS9/VOY. We've had three series, and four movies in that Era . I wouldn't mind a series in 2400, that could be interesting.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostTue Nov 28, 2006 8:45 am    

I'd very much like to see a movie set in the Enterprise C era. We never hear about that time, even though they had loads of events like Cardassians, Romulans and Klingons.

I don't think its prequels that fail, if they are done well they will succeed. But the only evidence we have is Enterprise, which wasn't done well and that's why it failed.

It did however get 15 million for its premiere, so people did tune in and then tuned out cause it wasn't that good.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
La Forge
Bajoran Colonel


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 2125
Location: Babylon 5

PostTue Nov 28, 2006 4:27 pm    

I've said it before and I'll say it again. If anything, we need at least ONE more movie in the TNG/DS9/VOY era. Why? Because, simply put, too many things were never finished.

What happened to the crew of VOY?

What's up with the Sisko?

What is the Federation like after the Dominion War?

Those questions need to be answered before we can move on.

And, yes, I am wholly against prequels. The subject of the missing era intrigues me, however, I don't want to see any productions about it. Star Trek needs to keep looking to the future. Look what going back to the past has done them.



-------signature-------

You'll never hear me say this again in my life, but...

Go Red Sox!

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostTue Nov 28, 2006 6:26 pm    

I couldn't agree more that we need to go forward in time.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostThu Nov 30, 2006 12:54 am    

CJ Cregg wrote:
I don't think its prequels that fail, if they are done well they will succeed. But the only evidence we have is Enterprise, which wasn't done well and that's why it failed.

It did however get 15 million for its premiere, so people did tune in and then tuned out cause it wasn't that good.


That's the problem. They don't do it well. No one does. No one seems to care enough to go back and do research. So they rewrite history.

As for ENT's premiere...people didn't know what to expect. All the knew was it was a Star Trek show. That's it. That is why they tuned in. Viewers dropped like flies as time went on.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
ilikefire208
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 226
Location: kansas

PostFri Dec 01, 2006 2:02 am    

that would be awesome....there are so many possiblities that you could do with a series such as

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostFri Dec 01, 2006 5:31 am    

I don't want to see something with chars we love recast, thats stupid and frankly, it turns be off no matter what movie or series it is.

Like Andy said, no one seems to want to do any research, and besides the fact it's sad because they would get paid for it, in this day in age, all it takes is a simple internet search.



-------signature-------

When you cried I'd wipe away all of your tears
When you'd scream I'd fight away all of your fears
And I held your hand through all of these years
But you still have
All of me


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostFri Dec 01, 2006 7:24 pm    

I'm on board with the anti-prequel gang. With the direction of the new movie, it's like they're trying to kill trek. Another series set in the "past" would be the worst choice they could make.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostFri Dec 01, 2006 7:36 pm    

Yeah, I've been doing some reading on IMDB, apparently, to do something like a DS9 movie wouldnt work because it's not as popular, and has to much back story

they have a good reasoning, try to lure in to fans, HOWEVER, they are concentraiting on new fans to much, and ignoring the fanbase they already have.

I'm not "againts" a prequel, but for god's sake, do some freaking research.



-------signature-------

When you cried I'd wipe away all of your tears
When you'd scream I'd fight away all of your fears
And I held your hand through all of these years
But you still have
All of me


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Voyager2004
Commodore


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA

PostMon Dec 04, 2006 3:21 pm    

No you see, I'm okay with this new movie...I am AGAINST prequels...but you wanna know how I see it? If J.J. Abrams did SUCH great job at bringing Mission Impossible back, and he comes in at Trek's hour of need, and he SCREWS it up, his directing career gets washed...Oh, he'll still be around, but it's like, "Oh he did GREAT with M.I. 3, but when Trek needed him the most, he SCREWED up..."

Haha...personally I think it's funny..just watch, you'll see...Now, I'm NOT saying he's gonna screw up, but at the same time, I wouldn't mind watchin him screw up...Because 1, he just trashed part of his career, and 2, it'll show Trek how stupid they are for allowing another prequel...



-------signature-------

"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostMon Dec 04, 2006 7:53 pm    

I don't mind the prequel part per se, what I mind is that it's clear that they will not be doing any research if any much beyond TOS. He has admited that he has not seen much of TNG, any of DS9 or Voy, or ENT. You can't get incolved with Star Trek and not watch any of it, that's where the other producers messed up.


-------signature-------

When you cried I'd wipe away all of your tears
When you'd scream I'd fight away all of your fears
And I held your hand through all of these years
But you still have
All of me


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com