| Earth: Final Conflict or Andromeda? |
| Earth: Final Conflict--WAY COOL! |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
| Andromeda--WAY BETTER! |
|
60% |
[ 6 ] |
| They Both Suck-Trek ON! |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| They Both Suck-Period. |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
| They're Both Okay... |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| No Comment. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Cathexis
The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 5901
Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
 Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:32 am Earth: Final Conflict Vs. Andromeda |
|
Okay, those of us true Roddenberry fans should be aware of the fact that he created at LEAST two OTHER Sci-Fi series besides Star Trek. They are Earth: Final Conflict and Andromeda.
I always preferred this Roddenberry series over Andromeda, and Trek over Earth: Final Conflict. But let's talk about which of the two NON-Trek series is better in your opinion.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
| Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:10 am |
|
I liked Andromeda better than Earth Final Conflict because I was familar with the actors on Andromeda.
|
|
|
Cathexis
The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 5901
Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
| Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:56 pm |
|
| Leo Wyatt wrote: | | I liked Andromeda better than Earth Final Conflict because I was familar with the actors on Andromeda. |
True, but Trance got on my nerves...personally.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
| Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:42 pm |
|
I didn't like Trance.... Dyan all the way lol
|
|
|
Lindley
Vice Admiral
Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
| Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:19 pm |
|
Both started out pretty good, but Andromeda went downhill a *lot* faster. So EFC it is.
|
|
|
Cathexis
The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 5901
Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
| Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:33 am |
|
I agreeeeeeeeeee....
Final Conflict much better IMO.
|
|
|
Paul Marshall
Rear Admiral
Joined: 30 Aug 2002
Posts: 2976
Location: Winston-Salem, North Carolina
|
| Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:25 pm |
|
EFC was kinda cheesy ... Andromeda is a lot better in my opinion ... but still, nothing beats Star Trek ...  
|
|
|
Cathexis
The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 5901
Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
| Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:34 pm |
|
Agreed, wholeheartedly. They both suck-Trek On!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Lindley
Vice Admiral
Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
| Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:17 pm |
|
| Paul Marshall wrote: | | nothing beats Star Trek ... |
I disagree.
Certainly neither of these do, but there are shows which are at least as good, if not better.
Not that I'm going to argue about specific shows; but I think it is important to keep an open mindset. If you assume nothing can possibly be better than Trek, you're likely to miss out on a great deal of quality entertainment.
|
|
|
Cathexis
The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 5901
Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:23 am |
|
| Lindley wrote: | | Paul Marshall wrote: | | nothing beats Star Trek ... |
I disagree.
Certainly neither of these do, but there are shows which are at least as good, if not better.
Not that I'm going to argue about specific shows; but I think it is important to keep an open mindset. If you assume nothing can possibly be better than Trek, you're likely to miss out on a great deal of quality entertainment. |
Good point.......sorry, but just to give a specific example, the new version of BSG is quite entertaining. I love it!
Of course, Trek will always be my favorite...but I'm always on the lookout for new, originaly, exciting sci-fi shows to venture out onto the airwaves!!
|
|
|
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
