Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:47 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Watching Enterprise for the first time on DVD. A critique
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Enterprise This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
SirAnthony
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 20

PostWed Jan 18, 2006 4:17 am    Watching Enterprise for the first time on DVD. A critique

Hi all,
I'm new to this board but I have been a big ST fan for many years. I really like the philosiphy of the shows. That being man kind going into the future. Handleing problems in new and different ways. I think the prime directive was brilliant forward thinking. I loved alot of the characters and thier unique problems and special abilities. I especiually loved episodes where they were caught in some anomily that forced them to think differently to save themselves.

I have been watching several episodes every week on DVD. I am half way through the fourth season. I have to say I'm very disapointed in the show.

First I didn't really like the idea of going back in time instead of looking forward. ST is about going forward. But thats not really the problem with the show. The problem is they seemed to have abanodoned many things that made ST great. The impression I got from the first season was they were trying to do Gunsmoke in space. I swear some of the plots were flat out rip offs from old westerns. This gave the show a real dated feel from the start. It's like the writers were plain tired of ST and decided they were going to do another show. Only they would call it Enterprise and have it on a ship in outer space. The best shows in the first season were the time travel cold war story line. In the special feature interview the creators of the show acted as if that story line was put there because the studio wanted something Sci Fi in the show. I think the studio was right.

There were a few good shows in the first two seasons. The time travel episodes (except the conclusion the cliff hanger between season one and two). A couple of episodes when they were attacked by pirates were good. But the show also suffered from the convieniant ending syndrome. There was a real problem with the show creating this big scenario. Then realizing they had no more time, just end the episode with a rediculous quicky. A perfect example is the episode when Archer is on trial by the Klingon empire. It wasn't a bad eposode. But Archer gets sentenced to this horrible prison that no one has ever escaped from. Not only that, but most prisoners only live for a year. So what happens? One day some one from enterprise waltzes into the prison and says "lets go". The end.

I had heard that the series gets better during the third and fourth season. I was dissapointed that it only got worse. The cowboy diplomacy was just too much. One of the things I like about ST is the show setting examples of how mankind would handle diplomacy and other situatuations differently in the future. Instead we have Archer torturing prisiners for information. This left a bad taste in my mouth. Not onlt did it happen once but several times. Then Enterprise turns to piracy themselves by raiding another friendly ship. I couldn't believe they actually did that. I was hoping they would return to that ship later and give the warp core back. But it never happened. Somehow I can't help feeling that the series was influenced by Sept 11th. If so it's too bad people are willing to give up thier ideals during a time of crisis like our president has.

There were some cool apects to season three. The whole sphere scenario and spacial distortions was a very cool idea that did not get explored nearly to my satisaction. The five xindi races were sort of cool. It would have been nice to learn more of how that was possible. They even mentioned a sixth extinct race but never elaborated. I think there were alot of missed oportunities in season three. Instead they did the end of the world thing. Somehow the Xindi had the technoligy to travel in warp conduits like the Borg do hundreds of years later. It works for me! The best eposode in season three was when Enterprise showed up from the past and we met old tpal. This was the only episode of enterprise were I actually cared about the characters.

Speaking of characters... That is another big problem with the show. There werent any good characters. I couldn't have cared less about any one of them. Characters have always been the heart of ST. Kirk, Spock and Bones were the heart of the first series. Then we had Data who was the best all time ST character. Patric Stuwart is a great actor and was born to be Picard. Deana Troy was a good "B" character. In Voyager we had the holographic doctor. The doctor is so close to taking over the number one spot in my mind. What a great funny character. Love her or hate her, you gota give Janeway credit for her dominating presense. For a couple of years 7of9 was more than a pretty face. A very interesing character who also happened to be STACKED! I loved Voyager and think it was the best of the best ST series. Good shows week after week after week. I don't mention DS9 because I hated that show. With the exception of Quark.

Back to Enterprise characters. Lets start with Archer. I felt he was miscast from the start. He was too nice a guy and just didn't have the right presence for the part. Later he turns into real jerk. It's no wonder Trip wants the hell off the ship. Speaking of trip... Once you get past the obvious cowboy oakie from wiskokie thing he was the best character on the show. But on NG or Voyager he would have been a "B" character at best. Tpal. Why was she there???? She was horrible. Absolutly horrible. The rest of the characters I could take or leave. I don't think it would have mattered if any of them weren't there. The doctor was sort of likeable. The Armoury guy needed a good ass wooping.

I still haven't seen the infamous final epesode. But I do know why Enterprise failed.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostWed Jan 18, 2006 1:44 pm    

Yeah all of your credibility went out the window when you said you hated DS9...

Not to mention, its painfully obvious you're trying to mix your politics with Star Trek. A topic I made in the DS9 section deal with that. The show will never work when you try to do that.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
SirAnthony
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 20

PostWed Jan 18, 2006 4:22 pm    

Founder wrote:
Yeah all of your credibility went out the window when you said you hated DS9...

Not to mention, its painfully obvious you're trying to mix your politics with Star Trek. A topic I made in the DS9 section deal with that. The show will never work when you try to do that.


Hm, I have no credibility because I didn't like DS9? OK. Personally I don't see how anyone couldn't see parralels between parts of Enterprise and the current political situation in this country. Weather the creators did it on purpose or subconsiously I think it is there. But we can agree to disagree.

Cheers


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.CommanderTuvok
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 02 Aug 2001
Posts: 331

PostWed Jan 18, 2006 4:55 pm    

I respect your opinion about enterprise being a disappointment, but it wasnt a total disaster, we got to see some parts of that time period that played its role, even tho there should have been so much more. There wasnt much of a prime directive before the federation was established, and it meant doing whatever it takes to survive.I didnt like archers decision to take a warp coil from a friendly ship and use it to complete its mission, but as its stands, other races would have commited to piracy just the same to enterprise, and was done on occasion. As for archer torchering people in a sense, it was imparitive to the survival of the human race and earth, because everyone was practically involved in a xindi plot or working for them in some form, and being nice wasnt the best idea in the expanse, it would have gotten you killed.So i can see why archer was the way he was.

In all enterprise was a good show, it just needed more add-ons to the episodes, to unfold more stories of the time period.I was happy they played enterprise, it was something else to look forward to.



-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
SirAnthony
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 20

PostWed Jan 18, 2006 5:06 pm    

Lt.CommanderTuvok wrote:
I respect your opinion about enterprise being a disappointment, but it wasnt a total disaster, we got to see some parts of that time period that played its role, even tho there should have been so much more. There wasnt much of a prime directive before the federation was established, and it meant doing whatever it takes to survive.I didnt like archers decision to take a warp coil from a friendly ship and use it to complete its mission, but as its stands, other races would have commited to piracy just the same to enterprise, and was done on occasion. As for archer torchering people in a sense, it was imparitive to the survival of the human race and earth, because everyone was practically involved in a xindi plot or working for them in some form, and being nice wasnt the best idea in the expanse, it would have gotten you killed.So i can see why archer was the way he was.

In all enterprise was a good show, it just needed more add-ons to the episodes, to unfold more stories of the time period.I was happy they played enterprise, it was something else to look forward to.


I agree that the show wasn't a total waste. It was worth watching... Barely. I understand the show portrayed them in situations where they had no choice. But thats the thing. The writers did have a choice. It might have been harder but they could have come up with more creative ways to solve problems. In the future they should be smarter.

Also if the show had better writing it might still be on the air. There also might be plans for the next series or movie. I think the creators of the show lost thier direction. Made alot of bad decisions on this show about writing, casting and the general directon of the show. As a result IMHO the series is dead. There won't be any more ST for some time. I think it will make a come back in 10 years or so. But for now it's over.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral


Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.

PostThu Jan 19, 2006 2:32 am    

Enterprise DVD's are going to be dusty in 20 years time. It's not going to be something that people still like to watch, like TNG on DVD is now 20 years later something people still watch and is still put on TV. No one will remember ENT in 20 years.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ZiriDelvar
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 79

PostFri Mar 31, 2006 6:48 pm    

I tend to agree that Enterprise will never have the same impact the other shows had. I think it will be memorable only as the last attempt at a Star Trek series.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostSat Apr 01, 2006 1:08 pm    

I understand that this is your descision and your own evaluation of that show and how everyone is different. But i disagree with you. I love ENTERPRISE but not so much that im am oblivious to its problems. In my opinion season 1 & 2 were excellent. They seemed more like the episodes Gene Rodenberry would want. A slower science fiction story where everything is explained and evaluated. I also liked season 3 too, it shows some of the extremes people will go to just to find the truth and how people can slip away and changed after a tragic series of events. Season 4 however. I wasnt keen on, It tryed to link with the other Star Treks which was a VERY bad idea. Also if you realised they made the character story lay out more like the origional series. In the origional it was mainly Kirk, Spock & McCoy. In Season 4 Enterprise is was mainly Archer, Tucker & T'Pol. A very bad idea indeed. One of the main things enterprised lacked was character building and A & B story lines in an episode.

Enterprise was a great show and had the potential to be a hell of alot more but it god held down by the star trek fans and the other star trek shows. Enterprise was based on the same idea as Smallville. It had no connections to the previous series. Accept in the end Enterprise tryed to mimic the other series and this lead to its downfall. The actors were great, the characters were great the enterprise universe was great and the idea was great. But in the end its was made into something is wasnt.

Im sorry SirAnthony but i strongly disagree with you. Also i love DS9 and i certainly dont think Voyager was the best Star Trek show.



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
JupiterPrime
Lieutenant


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 208

PostSun Apr 02, 2006 6:43 am    Re: Watching Enterprise for the first time on DVD. A critiqu

SirAnthony wrote:
...Tpal. Why was she there????


You're joking, right? not to mention that you DO REALIZE you answered your own question earlier...

SirAnthony wrote:
...7of9 was more than a pretty face. A very interesing character who also happened to be STACKED!...


as far as the DS9 debate goes, I wouldnt say it was the worst - but I agree that (for me) it was the pretty unwatchable because I dont care much for religion being mixed up in my science fiction....any of the episodes that didnt involve Bajoran religious beliefs or practices, ethics, morals, whatever...those were fine, just keep your hokey prophets out of my science fiction, thank you very much


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Vincent
Lieutenant


Joined: 01 Dec 2001
Posts: 187
Location: Jilvian Colony,Luna(Earths Moon)

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 12:29 am    Re: Watching Enterprise for the first time on DVD. A critiqu

SirAnthony wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this board but I have been a big ST fan for many years. I really like the philosiphy of the shows. That being man kind going into the future. Handleing problems in new and different ways. I think the prime directive was brilliant forward thinking. I loved alot of the characters and thier unique problems and special abilities. I especiually loved episodes where they were caught in some anomily that forced them to think differently to save themselves.

I have been watching several episodes every week on DVD. I am half way through the fourth season. I have to say I'm very disapointed in the show.

First I didn't really like the idea of going back in time instead of looking forward. ST is about going forward. But thats not really the problem with the show. The problem is they seemed to have abanodoned many things that made ST great. The impression I got from the first season was they were trying to do Gunsmoke in space. I swear some of the plots were flat out rip offs from old westerns. This gave the show a real dated feel from the start. It's like the writers were plain tired of ST and decided they were going to do another show. Only they would call it Enterprise and have it on a ship in outer space. The best shows in the first season were the time travel cold war story line. In the special feature interview the creators of the show acted as if that story line was put there because the studio wanted something Sci Fi in the show. I think the studio was right.

There were a few good shows in the first two seasons. The time travel episodes (except the conclusion the cliff hanger between season one and two). A couple of episodes when they were attacked by pirates were good. But the show also suffered from the convieniant ending syndrome. There was a real problem with the show creating this big scenario. Then realizing they had no more time, just end the episode with a rediculous quicky. A perfect example is the episode when Archer is on trial by the Klingon empire. It wasn't a bad eposode. But Archer gets sentenced to this horrible prison that no one has ever escaped from. Not only that, but most prisoners only live for a year. So what happens? One day some one from enterprise waltzes into the prison and says "lets go". The end.

I had heard that the series gets better during the third and fourth season. I was dissapointed that it only got worse. The cowboy diplomacy was just too much. One of the things I like about ST is the show setting examples of how mankind would handle diplomacy and other situatuations differently in the future. Instead we have Archer torturing prisiners for information. This left a bad taste in my mouth. Not onlt did it happen once but several times. Then Enterprise turns to piracy themselves by raiding another friendly ship. I couldn't believe they actually did that. I was hoping they would return to that ship later and give the warp core back. But it never happened. Somehow I can't help feeling that the series was influenced by Sept 11th. If so it's too bad people are willing to give up thier ideals during a time of crisis like our president has.

There were some cool apects to season three. The whole sphere scenario and spacial distortions was a very cool idea that did not get explored nearly to my satisaction. The five xindi races were sort of cool. It would have been nice to learn more of how that was possible. They even mentioned a sixth extinct race but never elaborated. I think there were alot of missed oportunities in season three. Instead they did the end of the world thing. Somehow the Xindi had the technoligy to travel in warp conduits like the Borg do hundreds of years later. It works for me! The best eposode in season three was when Enterprise showed up from the past and we met old tpal. This was the only episode of enterprise were I actually cared about the characters.

Speaking of characters... That is another big problem with the show. There werent any good characters. I couldn't have cared less about any one of them. Characters have always been the heart of ST. Kirk, Spock and Bones were the heart of the first series. Then we had Data who was the best all time ST character. Patric Stuwart is a great actor and was born to be Picard. Deana Troy was a good "B" character. In Voyager we had the holographic doctor. The doctor is so close to taking over the number one spot in my mind. What a great funny character. Love her or hate her, you gota give Janeway credit for her dominating presense. For a couple of years 7of9 was more than a pretty face. A very interesing character who also happened to be STACKED! I loved Voyager and think it was the best of the best ST series. Good shows week after week after week. I don't mention DS9 because I hated that show. With the exception of Quark.

Back to Enterprise characters. Lets start with Archer. I felt he was miscast from the start. He was too nice a guy and just didn't have the right presence for the part. Later he turns into real jerk. It's no wonder Trip wants the hell off the ship. Speaking of trip... Once you get past the obvious cowboy oakie from wiskokie thing he was the best character on the show. But on NG or Voyager he would have been a "B" character at best. Tpal. Why was she there???? She was horrible. Absolutly horrible. The rest of the characters I could take or leave. I don't think it would have mattered if any of them weren't there. The doctor was sort of likeable. The Armoury guy needed a good ass wooping.

I still haven't seen the infamous final epesode. But I do know why Enterprise failed.



i watched enterprise from beginning to end on dvd and i loved it.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
SirAnthony
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 20

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 2:13 am    

I'm glad to see some responses to this. I went to alot of trouble to write it because I felt the need to express my opinion on the show. It would have been nice to have a proof reader/editor but oh well. I see different people have different opinions on the show. Thats is normal.

I'm 41 years old. I have been watching Star Trek since I was a kid. I'm probably too old for it now but I still love it. I may be a little jaded watching TV all these years. I require a certain amount of sophistication in any program I watch. There was just too much wrong with Enterprise in my opinion. But I can still watch NG or Voyager and love them. I even purchased the original series on DVD and I'm enjoying that. I give it some slack because it was made in the 60's. Sometimes I see some mediocre acting etc. It's kind of campy but I still like it.

I have also been watching the first eposodes of DS9 and some of the episodes are not bad. I just didn't like the whole Maquee era of ST. I didn't like the direction the series took later on. I agree the religious aspect was annoying. Painting Sisco as some kind of profet was hard to swallow. I used to get real annoyed with Major Kira. But looking at her now... God she is really cute!


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 2:47 am    Re: Watching Enterprise for the first time on DVD. A critiqu

JupiterPrime wrote:
as far as the DS9 debate goes, I wouldnt say it was the worst - but I agree that (for me) it was the pretty unwatchable because I dont care much for religion being mixed up in my science fiction....any of the episodes that didnt involve Bajoran religious beliefs or practices, ethics, morals, whatever...those were fine, just keep your hokey prophets out of my science fiction, thank you very much


SirAnthony wrote:
I have also been watching the first eposodes of DS9 and some of the episodes are not bad. I just didn't like the whole Maquee era of ST. I didn't like the direction the series took later on. I agree the religious aspect was annoying. Painting Sisco as some kind of profet was hard to swallow. I used to get real annoyed with Major Kira. But looking at her now... God she is really cute!


Thank goodness the fans had NO input on Deep Space Nine. Otherwise we would have the same boring technobabble of VOY.

"Captain? To get out of this nebula, we're gonna need the digitizer while using the ogenier over the blah blah blah blah blah blah."

"Oh...well....I see. What an interesting way to get out of the Nebula. This science only show is SO exciting. Much more than a show with "beliefs, practices, ethics, morals or whatever" You know, the stuff that makes shows interesting and what Star Trek was built on...."

ENT "failed" because of continuity issues. Plain and simple. CGI was excellant, better than ALL of the previous shows. The cast was herald as the best looking of all casts. The acting was not really bad either. The stories weren't always original. The ones that did not mess with continuity were good. But the ones that did...it became too much for fans.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
SirAnthony
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 20

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 4:40 am    

I seriously doubt that the continuity of the series was the main reason for the downfall of Enterprise. It's as simple as this. The majority of people who were faithful to ST did not like the show. Otherwise it would still be on the air.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
JupiterPrime
Lieutenant


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 208

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 6:31 am    

Im not going to get suckered in to a debate about the usefulness or need of religion - if it works for you, fine - personally I think its a useless waste of time. but hey whatever floats your boat, just as long as you understand that mine deserves to float just as much as yours

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 12:44 pm    

SirAnthony wrote:
I seriously doubt that the continuity of the series was the main reason for the downfall of Enterprise. It's as simple as this. The majority of people who were faithful to ST did not like the show. Otherwise it would still be on the air.


You doubt its the continuity? Are you kidding me? That IS the chief complaint about ENT. The constant violations of the canon. Go to any site that discusses it and you will see. The major complaint is that ENT did not stick to the continuity that was established in the other shows. It has nothing to do with being "faithful to ST". I don't even know what you're talking about....

JupiterPrime wrote:
Im not going to get suckered in to a debate about the usefulness or need of religion - if it works for you, fine - personally I think its a useless waste of time. but hey whatever floats your boat, just as long as you understand that mine deserves to float just as much as yours


I'm not saying you can't "float". I'm saying DS9 would have been boring if it had been science. Religion added a dynamic to it, that none of the other shows had. Also, it gave the Bajorans and the Dominion CULTURE. Its bad enough most of the aliens in ST look the same, but on top of it they all have to be cultureless athiests? It was a way to make the aliens that we would have to see day in and day out(Bajorans, Cardassians, Dominion) a sense of an alien culture.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 1:26 pm    

I'll agree to the canon Violatons there was plenty of them, but there was also to much nit picking on the fans part. They found violations where they didn't exsist. THEN the reaction is "We didn't want it cancelled....just fixed" well, what the HELL do you think will happen when no one watches it, and does nothing but bitch about it? Pretty obvius to me. It's a shame this happend to the actors, the cast was wonderful.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 5:50 pm    

I agree with what all of you were saying about the cast. From the very first episode the acting was superb. Definatly the best out of all Star Trek. You watch the first season of TNG, DS9 & VOY and you will see that some of the acting was absolutly appauling. Mainly from Ensign Kim, Commander Sisko, Dr. Bashir, Councellor Troi. But then you watch the very first few episodes of Enterise and you will be amazed at the difference. Trust me on this one

Also yes the continuity was an issue among the fans. I think the makers of enterprise shouldnt have been influenced by fans so easily. If they didnt listen to all of the fans complaints and suggestions then it wouldnt have suddenly gotten worse.

Also the episodes of ENTERPRISE that had been done before in other trek series. I actually think that many of the cover episodes they did were actually more like the episode it should have been for the other series. Episodes like "Singularity" & "North Star". "
North Star" is a re-make of "The 37s" From Voyager and i think the enterprise version was mutch better.
"Singularity" is a re-make of Voyagers "Scientific Method" Which was taken from The Next Generations "Schisms" I think the best is "Schisms" followed by "Singularity", "Scientific Method" comes last in my books.



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Kuro-chan
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 335
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 7:18 pm    

SirAnthony wrote:
I seriously doubt that the continuity of the series was the main reason for the downfall of Enterprise. It's as simple as this. The majority of people who were faithful to ST did not like the show. Otherwise it would still be on the air.


Check out Trek Fans United. They launched a MASSIVE campaign to try and save the latest Trek spinoff, and managed to raise over 3 million dollars. I think it's safe to say those dedicated fans gave it their all.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Vincent
Lieutenant


Joined: 01 Dec 2001
Posts: 187
Location: Jilvian Colony,Luna(Earths Moon)

PostMon Apr 03, 2006 11:43 pm    

SirAnthony wrote:
I'm glad to see some responses to this. I went to alot of trouble to write it because I felt the need to express my opinion on the show. It would have been nice to have a proof reader/editor but oh well. I see different people have different opinions on the show. Thats is normal.

I'm 41 years old. I have been watching Star Trek since I was a kid. I'm probably too old for it now but I still love it. I may be a little jaded watching TV all these years. I require a certain amount of sophistication in any program I watch. There was just too much wrong with Enterprise in my opinion. But I can still watch NG or Voyager and love them. I even purchased the original series on DVD and I'm enjoying that. I give it some slack because it was made in the 60's. Sometimes I see some mediocre acting etc. It's kind of campy but I still like it.

I have also been watching the first eposodes of DS9 and some of the episodes are not bad. I just didn't like the whole Maquee era of ST. I didn't like the direction the series took later on. I agree the religious aspect was annoying. Painting Sisco as some kind of profet was hard to swallow. I used to get real annoyed with Major Kira. But looking at her now... God she is really cute!




Your never to old to be a star trek fan, ive been one since the 70's and if i cant watch it by tv then i will by dvd,its never a dull day in my neighborhood.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostTue Apr 04, 2006 12:09 am    

Sonic74205 wrote:
I agree with what all of you were saying about the cast. From the very first episode the acting was superb. Definatly the best out of all Star Trek. You watch the first season of TNG, DS9 & VOY and you will see that some of the acting was absolutly appauling. Mainly from Ensign Kim, Commander Sisko, Dr. Bashir, Councellor Troi. But then you watch the very first few episodes of Enterise and you will be amazed at the difference. Trust me on this one

Also yes the continuity was an issue among the fans. I think the makers of enterprise shouldnt have been influenced by fans so easily. If they didnt listen to all of the fans complaints and suggestions then it wouldnt have suddenly gotten worse.

Also the episodes of ENTERPRISE that had been done before in other trek series. I actually think that many of the cover episodes they did were actually more like the episode it should have been for the other series. Episodes like "Singularity" & "North Star". "
North Star" is a re-make of "The 37s" From Voyager and i think the enterprise version was mutch better.
"Singularity" is a re-make of Voyagers "Scientific Method" Which was taken from The Next Generations "Schisms" I think the best is "Schisms" followed by "Singularity", "Scientific Method" comes last in my books.


Yeah I can see the plot reuse, and I will agree TNG/ENT did them better then VOY It helped ENT that some of the actors were well versed in the way of sci-fi already. Scott Bakula had been on Quantum Leap, Jolene Blalock had been on SG-1,.....


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostTue Apr 04, 2006 8:22 pm    

Quote:

Yeah I can see the plot reuse, and I will agree TNG/ENT did them better then VOY It helped ENT that some of the actors were well versed in the way of sci-fi already. Scott Bakula had been on Quantum Leap, Jolene Blalock had been on SG-1,.....


She was on SG1?! I hate that show and cant stand watching it. Damn these emotions! Was she in it before Enterprise then?



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
SirAnthony
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 20

PostThu Apr 13, 2006 6:00 am    

Well I think we can all agree to disagree. I wish we had more ST to look forward to!

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com