Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:56 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
The child-care plans (Liberal versus Conservative)
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostTue Dec 06, 2005 9:54 pm    The child-care plans (Liberal versus Conservative)

Okay, so the Tories and the Grits have extremely different policies when it comes to this.
CBC News wrote:
Tories promise new child-care allowance
Last Updated Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:45:09 EST
CBC News

Stephen Harper unveiled a Conservative plan on Monday that would give parents of young children $100 a month for child care.

The Tory leader made the announcement at a noisy day-care centre in Ottawa. "This is just like a caucus meeting," he said on a campaign stop for the Jan. 23 federal election.

Addressing the challenges parents face in raising kids while trying to earn a living, Harper said, "The Conservative plan for families will help parents find that balance."

The Conservatives' two-part plan includes money to help create child-care spaces as well as the $100-a-month "choice in child-care allowance."

With the new allowance, families would receive $1,200 a year for each child under the age of six.

"Parents can spend the money however they wish. You can choose the child-care option that best suits your family's needs," Harper said.

"It's hard enough to be a parent. But government should help parents with choices not limit them," Harper said.

"In fact, the only people who should be making these choices are parents, not politicians, not the government."

Some child-care advocates, however, say the Tory plan is based on old, outmoded thinking.

"We've been trying to fund child care through benefits to families or parent subsidies for 30 years, and it hasn't worked," said Kira Heineck, executive director of the Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care. "We'd like to see investment directly in programs across the country."

The new program would not replace any existing major benefit program, Harper said. It would be in addition to the current Canada Child Tax Benefit, the National Child Benefit Supplement and the child-care expense deduction.

A Conservative government would also honour the one-year bilateral commitments the Liberal government reached with provinces for institutional child care, Harper said.

The new benefit would not be clawed back from middle-income families, he said. It would be taxable in the hands of the spouse earning the lower income.

"Government should support your choices, not limit them," he said.

Liberal Leader Paul Martin said he would put money into child-care programs. In the last campaign, the Liberals promised to build a $5 billion Quebec-style national child-care system that they claimed would create 250,000 licensed child-care spaces by 2009.

"Mr. Harper has said he does not believe, and I quote, in subsidized child care and early development," Martin told reporters in St. John's. "Well, I do."

The second part of the Conservative plan calls for $250 million a year to be set aside for investment in community child care. The money is meant to increase the availability of child care by offering tax credits for capital investments in child-care spaces.

Harper predicted the plan would create 125,000 spaces over five years.

The Conservative funding would be in addition to the existing benefits available to Canadians, including the Canada Child Tax Benefit . The total cost of the program would be $10.9 billion over five years.

Source
CBC News wrote:
Liberals to extend child-care plan
Last Updated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:57:31 EST
CBC News

The Liberals renewed their commitment to a national child-care system on Tuesday, with Leader Paul Martin vowing to increase Ottawa's spending to $11 billion.

In their 2004 election platform, the Liberals promised to spend $5 billion over five years. Martin now says his government would kick in another $6 billion starting in 2009, when the first commitment runs out.

"Like medicare, our program will be a lasting addition to our social foundation," Martin said, speaking at a YMCA child-care facility in Saint John, N.B., where he bantered with some of the excited kids as he began his announcement.

"We'll see how happy you are 20 minutes from now if you still have to be sitting there and be quiet," Martin joked.

Martin's announcement comes a day after Conservative Leader Stephen Harper set out his party's child-care plan, the key component of which would be a $1,200 annual allowance for parents of young children.

Martin dismissed the Tory plan as not about child care at all.

"There's going to be no early learning, no regulation, no insistence on high quality, so it's simply an empty box," Martin said. "That's not a child-care plan. What it really is is maybe a kind of baby bonus, but that's it."

The child-care plan extension is the first major policy announcement by the Liberals, who have been mostly reacting to Tory proposals since the campaign for the Jan. 23 vote started a week ago.

"We're here to discuss the next steps that we want to take towards a permanent and nationwide system of early learning and child care," Martin said.

"Creating a nationwide system of early learning and child care is a great national endeavour. It speaks to the good that government can do."

Source

Interesting divide.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Valathous
The Canadian, eh


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 19074
Location: Centre Bell

PostWed Dec 07, 2005 2:43 am    

I prefer Martin's. Not only is it putting more into programs for young children (a lot more) but with Harper's plan you know that many of the people won't use their nice big $100 a month for their child. They'll spend it on other things and continue struggling. Not that $100 would prevent them from struggling with their children if on a low-income anyways.

Go Martin!



-------signature-------

The Montreal Canadiens - Celebrating 100 years of glory.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Brightstar82
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 4394
Location: A Borg Cube....Where Else?

PostWed Dec 07, 2005 8:27 am    

Im going with Paul Martin all the way. Sure Harper says these things now but I doubt he'll come through with all these promices once he gets into office.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com