| Author |
Message |
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
 Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:33 am Gomery's report |
|
This acutally has three articles associated with it, so I'll post the most relevant, and I'll trust all of you intelligent and responsible people to read the other two (or at least skim them and say you did) before forming some cement-and-teflon opinions.
| CBC News wrote: | Gomery blames Chr�tien for sponsorship flaws
Last Updated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:25:44 EST
CBC News
Former prime minister Jean Chr�tien and his chief of staff must be held responsible for the flawed running of the federal sponsorship program from 1994 to 2003, Justice John Gomery said in his first report on the scandal, made public Tuesday.
Former prime minister Jean Chretien leaves his home in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 1. (CP Photo/Jonathan Hayward)
Prime Minister Paul Martin has referred the report to the RCMP for possible criminal investigations, ordered the Liberal Party to repay $1.14 million to the public purse and asked that 10 people named in the report be banned from the party for life. Chr�tien was not one of those people, said Martin.
Gomery also assigned blame to a handful of other people involved in the $332 million scheme to raise the federal government's visibility, primarily in post-sovereignty-referendum Quebec.
They include Chuck Guit�, the "untouchable" bureaucrat who considered the program his baby and used it to reward friends as well as Liberal-linked ad firms, and Jean Corriveau, a good friend of Chr�tien's who ran a "kickback scheme" to funnel taxpayers' dollars from the program to his own pocket and the Quebec wing of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Also implicated is former public works minister Alfonso Gagliano, "who chose to perpetuate the irregular manner of directing the sponsorship program."
However, those people would not have been able to mismanage or benefit from the sponsorship program had it been set up correctly in the first place, Gomery found.
"Since Mr. Chr�tien chose to run the program from his own office, and to have his own exempt staff take charge of its direction, he is accountable for the defective manner in which the sponsorship program and initiatives were implemented."
Chr�tien's lawyer David Scott said he would be making a "very strong recommendation" to his client, hinting to reporters that he would be taking Gomery's report to a federal court. Scott suggested he would seek to have the findings challenged based on Gomery being biased and ignoring certain evidence.
Chr�tien's longtime chief of staff, Jean Pelletier, was Guit�'s chief contact in the Prime Minister's Office, acting as an un-elected cabinet minister when it came to running the mostly unpublicized and unchecked disbursement of millions of dollars, Gomery wrote.
"Mr. Pelletier failed to take the most elementary precautions against mismanagement � and Mr. Chr�tien was responsible for him," the commission chairman wrote.
However, Gomery said there was no evidence that either man was directly involved in Corriveau's "wrongdoing," entitling them "to be exonerated from blame for Mr. Corriveau's misconduct."
Martin bears no blame
Also exonerated by the report was Paul Martin, who was Chretien's minister of finance during most of the time the sponsorship program was in operation.
"The Department of Finance and its minister have no oversight role for other departments' expenditures, other than setting the financial context via the fiscal framework," the report said.
As a result, Martin "is entitled, like other ministers in the Quebec caucus, to be exonerated from any blame for carelessness or misconduct."
Guit� was 'untouchable'
Gomery, normally a justice of the Quebec Superior Court, held 136 hearings and listened to 172 witnesses between September 2004 and June 2005 before presenting his report on what went wrong with the program.
Much of the three-book report traces the relationships and transactions that led to almost half of all available sponsorship dollars going to advertising and communications firms in Quebec, chiefly five agencies with strong ties to the Liberal Party of Canada.
Justice John Gomery finishes his statement in Ottawa, Tuesday.
Of the $332 million spent between 1994 and 2003, Gomery said, 44.4 per cent or $147 million went to the agencies in the form of commissions and production fees.
The chief channeller of those payments was Guit�, who seemed to be operating with little or no supervision from his deputy minister at Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ranald Quail.
"With the support and approval of persons at the highest level of government, Mr. Guit� was untouchable and beyond the control of Mr. Quail, in spite of the latter's obligation to manage his department," Gomery wrote.
Quail was also found to hold responsibility for the program's mismanagement, though Gomery expressed sympathy with his predicament. Quail's unruly subordinate seemed to have a direct link to the Prime Minister's Office.
At the same time, Quail was dealing with Martin's deficit-cutting plans, which directed him to cut 5,800 people from his staff over three years.
Guit� and Brault before the courts
Guit� got no such sympathy from Gomery's report. "He was in a special category, seemingly exempt from the usual reporting rules, and not obliged to conform to normal practices and procedures ... " Gomery wrote.
"Only one subordinate, Allan Cutler, dared to challenge Mr. Guit�'s authority and methods and, as a result, he was declared surplus by Mr. Guit�."
Guit� and one of the Quebec ad firm owners who benefited most from the program, Jean Brault, face a total of six fraud charges in connection with sponsorship invoices. The two men are scheduled to go to trial in the spring, after the release of Gomery's final report on Feb. 1.
As president of Groupaction Marketing Inc., Brault has been a central figure at the inquiry. His testimony last spring detailed secret cash payments to the Liberals in return for promises of more sponsorship contracts, as well as demands from Corriveau and other Quebec Liberal officials that he place party workers on his payroll.
"The commission accepts all of Mr. Brault's testimony as credible," Gomery wrote.
Copyright �2005 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation - All Rights Reserved |
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/11/01/gomery-report051101.html
And this is Chr�tien's response:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/11/01/chretien-gomery051101.html
Really, it's over. I mean, I liked Jean Chr�tien better than Paul Martin, but if a public inquiry places the blame on him, then I don't see why Chr�tien should pursue this into court (except, of course, for his own personal reasons). He's just further showing that the public really doesn't have any power. 
|
|
|
Brightstar82
Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 4394
Location: A Borg Cube....Where Else?
|
| Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:16 pm |
|
I totally agree with u...Im not a huge Paul Martin fan myself.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
