Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:31 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Should women be allowed to be bishops?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Should women be ordained as priests/bishops?
Yes
100%
 100%  [ 11 ]
No
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 11

Author Message
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:03 pm    Should women be allowed to be bishops?

This may be a sensitive topic, but I hope there will be no tension in here.

Before I post my views, let me say that I am not a member of any Anglican church or the Roman Catholic Church.

There has been a big debate recently about whether women should be allowed to be bishops in The Church of England and The Roman Catholic Church. There has in fact been a debate for years, but it's in the spotlight once again.

I believe in equal rights for everyone. I like women very much. I think they do good in a lot of professions like nursing. I also believe they do well in jobs that used to be male-dominated like the Police and Fire Service, and the Armed Forces. If they were to be ordained as priests and bishops, I am sure they could do a good job, especially as a lot of women are very compassionate.

However, I don't know what the theological reasons are behind women not being allowed to be priests or bishops (women can be vicars in The Church of England, but not bishops, whilst the Roman Catholic Church does not allow women priests). To be honest, I am wondering what the theological answer is.

I look forward to reading people's views.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:28 pm    

Theres already a woman nearing that role her name is Sinead O'Conner the former singer turned Priest.



Last edited by borgslayer on Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:31 pm; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:29 pm    

That's news to me. Do you have any more information, please?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:32 pm    

You can visit her website and she has info on that.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:34 pm    

I've just had a look at some information about that. It happened in the late 90s. I must have missed that piece of news.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:43 pm    

How ironic. The women who tore a picture of the Pope in half, while saying "Fight the real enemy", is now trying to be a Priest. The power of forgiveness....

I'm a Catholic. As I understand it, they mirror the choosing of a Priest as Jesus did with the Apostles. Which we all men.

This isn't really discrimination IMO. Women are not seen as lesser beings in the Church. In fact, many women are put on a hig pedestal. For example, Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and Mother of the Church is seen as very important.

I think some Churches do allow women and married people. So its not like a 100% ban or anything.

I used to assume that Nuns were the female equivalent of a Priest, but I guess I was wrong.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 8:49 pm    

Quote:
I'm a Catholic. As I understand it, they mirror the choosing of a Priest as Jesus did with the Apostles. Which we all men.


I can't really debate here, not being an Anglican or Catholic. I can only read the comments in this topic and learn from them.

Is there a reason Jesus only chose men, Founder?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 9:51 pm    

Founder wrote:
How ironic. The women who tore a picture of the Pope in half, while saying "Fight the real enemy", is now trying to be a Priest. The power of forgiveness....


If you cared to hear her resoning for doing that she was refering to the sexual abuse going on in the churches that were being ignored. But I guess you didn't know that.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 9:59 pm    

But isn't there an alternative version of the Jesus and his apostles about Mary Magdalene and that she was actually supposed to lead the church but the men didn't like that so they took over and rewrite history by making her seem like a prostitute.

It was in the Da Vinci Code i think



-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 10:14 pm    

Superman wrote:
Is there a reason Jesus only chose men, Founder?


I'm not sure to tell you the truth. Not even the Church knows for a fact.

Pope John Paul II said this about the matter:

"In calling only men as his Apostles, Christ acted in a completely free and sovereign manner. In doing so, he exercised the same freedom with which, in all his behaviour, he emphasized the dignity and the vocation of women, without conforming to the prevailing customs and to the traditions sanctioned by the legislation of the time."

Jeff Miller wrote:
Founder wrote:
How ironic. The women who tore a picture of the Pope in half, while saying "Fight the real enemy", is now trying to be a Priest. The power of forgiveness....


If you cared to hear her resoning for doing that she was refering to the sexual abuse going on in the churches that were being ignored. But I guess you didn't know that.


Dude, shut up. I'm well aware of why she was did what she did. She got what she deserved for doing it and apologized. I don't care if she wants to be a priest. I think its nice that she apologized and trying to be within the ?Church. Next time, do this crazy thing call READ.

CJ Cregg wrote:
But isn't there an alternative version of the Jesus and his apostles about Mary Magdalene and that she was actually supposed to lead the church but the men didn't like that so they took over and rewrite history by making her seem like a prostitute.

It was in the Da Vinci Code i think


Its possible. You never know.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 11:22 pm    

I don't want them to, but I can't really think of a reason besides that I am a little sexist I suppose. It wouldn't really be a big deal to me if they were allowed to become preists...I think it is just that I am so used to seeing mens as preists it would be weird.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 11:41 pm    

Founder wrote:
Dude, shut up. I'm well aware of why she was did what she did. She got what she deserved for doing it and apologized. I don't care if she wants to be a priest. I think its nice that she apologized and trying to be within the ?Church. Next time, do this crazy thing call READ.


Dude, you call me a dude? what are you a surfer from the 80's? how about you don't tell me what to do and I don't get in your face? I was just stating why she did what she did. Oh, and I do read. here let me talk in your language.

Dude, take like a chill pill.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 11:49 pm    

Jeff Miller wrote:
Founder wrote:
Dude, shut up. I'm well aware of why she was did what she did. She got what she deserved for doing it and apologized. I don't care if she wants to be a priest. I think its nice that she apologized and trying to be within the ?Church. Next time, do this crazy thing call READ.


Dude, you call me a dude? what are you a surfer from the 80's? how about you don't tell me what to do and I don't get in your face? I was just stating why she did what she did. Oh, and I do read. here let me talk in your language.

Dude, take like a chill pill.


Heh, you can't reply to my post, so you make a stupid comment on the "80's". I didn't think you could answer me. No you don't read. You didn't have to state why she did what she did, I didn't ask you. I've seen your posts in WN. I would never ask you for informtation.

Puck wrote:
I don't want them to, but I can't really think of a reason besides that I am a little sexist I suppose. It wouldn't really be a big deal to me if they were allowed to become preists...I think it is just that I am so used to seeing mens as preists it would be weird.


I feel the way kind of. I feel that it wouldn't be HORRIBLE if they became priests, but there are bigger problems in the world. It seems like this doesn't need immediate attention. I don't know. I guess I want to know WHY they want to be priests.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 11:54 pm    

Jeff Miller wrote:
Founder wrote:
Dude, shut up. I'm well aware of why she was did what she did. She got what she deserved for doing it and apologized. I don't care if she wants to be a priest. I think its nice that she apologized and trying to be within the ?Church. Next time, do this crazy thing call READ.


Dude, you call me a dude? what are you a surfer from the 80's? how about you don't tell me what to do and I don't get in your face? I was just stating why she did what she did. Oh, and I do read. here let me talk in your language.

Dude, take like a chill pill.


Stay on topic.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostTue Jul 26, 2005 11:55 pm    

I'm editing this post because Puck asked me to.

Ok as I said she did what she did because of the churches history with people.

If women want to become priest or whatever I say let them. I don't see what bad it would do.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
purple_kathryn
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Belfast

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 1:25 am    

AFAIK one of the reasons Jesus in the bible didn't want women to be "preists" was because men wouldn't listen to them as they weren't men.

Although pretty much all religions have seen women as "lesser"including the various christian religions - women are unclean as they menstruate dontcha know, there's many references in the bible about folks being allowed to sell their daughters and women submitting to their husbands.

On a personal basis, no one should be told they aren't allowed to do something that they're perfectly capable of simply because of their sex.



-------signature-------

"There's not much makeup in the army, is there? No. They only have that nighttime look, and that's a bit slapdash, isn't it?" - Eddie Izzard

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
nadia
cookie


Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 8560
Location: Australia

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 1:27 am    

Yes, woman should be allowed too. We should be treated equally!

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Seven of Nine
Sammie's Mammy


Joined: 16 Jun 2001
Posts: 7871
Location: North East England

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 2:47 am    

I think that women should be allowed to become bishops. I am a member of the Church of England, where women are already allowed to become priests. I cannot say anything about Catholics, as I don't know enough. I do know that the Church of England tries to promote equality and tolerance though.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 5:26 am    

I am Pentecostal and I see women preachers all the time.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
nadia
cookie


Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 8560
Location: Australia

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 5:27 am    

Leo Wyatt wrote:
I am Pentecostal and I see women preachers all the time.


Me to! My mum is a preacher!


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
madlilnerd
Duchess of Dancemat


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 5885
Location: Slough, England

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 6:14 am    

Paul wrote in one of his letters (bare with me, I'm quoting from a pretty shaking memory): "We are all equal in the eyes of God... men and women."
But in another one of his letters, he wrote that only men should be priests!

The Catholic church in Britian has a shortage of priests at the moment, so they have started advertising on beer mats (I kid you not). They are also thinking of allowing priests to marry, which I think is quite a good idea. I live next door but one from the local vicarage, and two vicars that have lived there are both married (well, one of them had an affair and left in disgrace, but the new one is a lot better). I think it's best for vicars or priests to be married with children, because it gives them a better view on family life and might make it easier to understand family problems within their parish.

As for women bishops... tricky. I'm thinking that it's not going to happen in the Roman Catholic church. They're very traditional, and I salute them for sticking to their metaphorical guns. Maybe, in the Anglican church, after all, the bishop of cantabury is that crazy druid guy (he's really nice) and we soon might have gay bishops.
I, myself, have not given my life to God and do not plan to become a vicar, high priestess, druid, oracle or bishop. For a while, I wanted to be a monk or a nun. Being a Monk looked cool... thats all. But then i learnt all this stuf about them having to put marbles in their shoes as punsihment, and it put me off.
But being a nun would still be good... because i read this article about nuns living a very long time because of their righteous regimes.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
purple_kathryn
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Belfast

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 12:08 pm    

Um their "metaphorical guns" are that women are worth less than men. Just because something is traditional doesn't make it right. Slavery was "traditional" for thousands of years.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 12:57 pm    

Actually, if you read about the bits where it says a woman should be under a man you'll find that it's in certain contexts.

For example "I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ." (1 Corinthians 11:3)

That may seem like a pretty unpolitically correct thing to say. But let me quote from a book called "Tender Warrior" by Stu Weber. It's quite Christian based, so sorry if it seems like preaching to people who aren't. Just it has to be to explain the context.

Quote:
Let me ask you a question or two...

Does it bother your wife that "God is the head of Christ"?

Probably Not

Does it bother her "Christ is the head of every man"?

No, if fact, she probably loves it and prays it will be realised more every day.

Does it bother your wife that "the man is the head of a woman"?

Mostly likely!Of course it bothers her. Why is that?

It's probably half due to her sinful nature... and half due to your sinful nature. Why, in our culture, do so many discussions of male/ female roles seem so painful, unreal, unfair, unfunny and even preposterous? Because of men that demand submission from their wives but in turn submit themselves to no one, including God.We men truncate the divine process by our arrogant, foolish, egocentric, SELFishness. We cannot blame woman for being frustrated because they fear the injustice of being under headship that itself is not accountable.

Some men draw a big line in the sand and say, "I ain't accountable to nobody, but I am the boss of you." That is neither right nor biblical. Yes, God has given men a certain amount of authority. But they are first and foremost men under authority. We always want to quote the werse that says "The man is the head of a woman." But we conviently forget the first part of the verse that says "Christ is the head of every man!" No exceptions. That's me... and you.


So basically we should obey what God's rules are, so not mistreating women and so on. The reason it says man is incharge is that we can't all be individuals or it won't work. If at a junction there was no lights to show who was in the right of way then there would be lots of accidents. The lights make the decissions (if you get what I mean). But the man should take into consideration what the woman says, and what her needs are. Otherwise he's either abusing her but not looking after her, or messing things up it's not good. Hope that helps.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 5:49 pm    

Thank you for posting that, Jeremy. It's very informative.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostThu Jul 28, 2005 2:03 pm    

purple_kathryn wrote:
AFAIK one of the reasons Jesus in the bible didn't want women to be "preists" was because men wouldn't listen to them as they weren't men.

This is true. Thats why he did the smart thing and made them men. At that time period, women simply were not heard and ignored.

Although pretty much all religions have seen women as "lesser"including the various christian religions - women are unclean as they menstruate dontcha know, there's many references in the bible about folks being allowed to sell their daughters and women submitting to their husbands.

Not really. You're taking it out of context.

On a personal basis, no one should be told they aren't allowed to do something that they're perfectly capable of simply because of their sex.


It goes a little deeper than that. You just don't get it.

nadia wrote:
Yes, woman should be allowed too. We should be treated equally!


This has nothing to do with equality...

Seven of Nine wrote:
I do know that the Church of England tries to promote equality and tolerance though.


See above statement...

madlilnerd wrote:
They're very traditional, and I salute them for sticking to their metaphorical guns.


You're a good person.

purple_kathryn wrote:
Um their "metaphorical guns" are that women are worth less than men. Just because something is traditional doesn't make it right. Slavery was "traditional" for thousands of years.


No it doesn't. Could you actually READ posts? I've already explained that. The Catholic Church does not believe that women are worth less than men. Ever heard of the Virgin Mary? Do you understand how imporant she is to the Religion?


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com