| Author |
Message |
borgslayer
Rear Admiral
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas
|
 Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:23 pm Shuttle rollout under way |
|
| Quote: |
NASA: Crack found in external fuel tank not an issue
By Michael Coren
CNN
Wednesday, April 6, 2005 Posted: 4:38 PM EDT (2038 GMT)
(CNN) -- Since the loss of Columbia in 2003, thousands of people have spent the past two years working to make the space shuttle into a safer vehicle.
That labor inched closer to payoff Wednesday afternoon when Discovery, with its two solid rocket boosters and external fuel tank attached to its belly, rolled out of the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at 2:04 pm EDT for an eight-hour, four-mile journey to the launch pad at Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida.
A crawler transporter will move the shuttle to pad 39B where it will sit until launch -- set for no earlier than May 15.
The rollout was delayed for a little more than two hours when a crack in the fuel tank's insulation was found. NASA concluded the crack, near a non-cryogenic (low temperature) area, was a minor imperfection and did not need repair.
NASA spokeswoman Tracy Young said the engineering staff decided Discovery can safely fly "as is," because of the small size and the location of the crack.
Heavy burden
As Discovery approaches its May 15 launch date, the shuttle carries a heavy burden.
"We feel very comfortable that this will be a very safe mission, and we would not launch if we didn't feel this would be a very safe launch," NASA spokeswoman Jessica Rye told CNN.com on Monday.
NASA is attempting to regain its footing following the loss of Columbia, which disintegrated over Texas on February 1, 2003. After the accident, NASA was castigated for safety lapses and complacency about risks to the shuttle.
Discovery's launch will be NASA's first manned space flight since Columbia.
"We understand from an engineer's standpoint that [the shuttle] is a developmental vehicle and will be until the last flight," said LeRoy Cain, the NASA flight director who oversaw Columbia's abortive re-entry.
"We have taken a very hard look at ourselves. ... [The mistakes] are very easy to see now, but rather than dwell on that we're moving forward. We understand what it is we're about to go do."
NASA was forced to change its safety culture and re-evaluate the shuttle's flight worthiness after Columbia burned up.
Damaged thermal insulation on Columbia's left wing allowed superheated gases to penetrate and destroy the vehicle with all seven astronauts aboard.
Since then, Discovery has had 286 modifications, including 41 recommended by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, or CAIB, the independent panel that examined the disaster.
It has also benefited from a suite of new imaging technology.
Discovery can launch from May 15 to June 3. If it misses this period, the next launch opportunity occurs between July 12 and 31 when lighting conditions allow NASA to photograph the shuttle's daylight ascent, another CAIB recommendation.
"We have scheduled the 15th of May as our targeted launch date," said Michael Kostelnik, deputy associate administrator for international space station and space shuttle programs.
"But it should be clearly understood that this is a 'not earlier than' date, which gives us the earliest opportunity we can bring all of the processing elements together and have a credible window to get to the international space station."
Despite their optimism, NASA officials cautioned that the launch date could be pushed back if difficulties crop up -- as they did last week.
Vital paperwork for the shuttle to resume flight was not filed on time, according to the task force monitoring the agency's efforts. NASA said it might require two weeks before the approval process is completed.
Mission: Safety
Discovery's mission, and the one after it, will focus almost exclusively on safety. The space agency will test safety hardware and shuttle maneuvers designed to prevent problems like the one that struck Columbia.
Exquisitely precise radar systems and long-range cameras will be trained on the orbiter. The shuttle will carry a repair kit for its protective thermal tiles and an orbiter boom sensor system on its robotic arm to scan the shuttle with cameras and lasers.
Discovery will even perform a pirouette in view of the international space station to inspect its delicate underbelly. As a last resort, a second shuttle will stand by on the ground in a rescue mission is needed.
All of this is part of NASA's drive to reconstitute a "safety culture" that had eroded since the Challenger accident almost two decades earlier, according to the CAIB report, issued in August 2003.
"NASA's organizational culture had as much to do with this accident as foam did," the CAIB report stated.
Columbia was doomed during launch when a chunk of foam the size of a briefcase and the weight of a typical plastic foam cooler slammed into Columbia's left wing at high speed.
The impact punched a hole in the leading edge, breaching the protective covering of reinforced carbon carbon. When the shuttle re-entered Earth's atmosphere, superheated gases destroyed the craft.
At the time, top shuttle managers were aware of the foam problem but had dismissed it as a threat. Lower-level engineers worried it might endanger the shuttle, but their concerns reportedly never reached mission managers.
The CAIB said NASA's intolerance for dissent, relaxed safety standards, tightened budget and slipshod management all contributed to the disaster.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/04/06/shuttle.rollout/index.html |
|
|
|
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:44 pm |
|
| The Article wrote: | The rollout was delayed for a little more than two hours when a crack in the fuel tank's insulation was found. NASA concluded the crack, near a non-cryogenic (low temperature) area, was a minor imperfection and did not need repair.
NASA spokeswoman Tracy Young said the engineering staff decided Discovery can safely fly "as is," because of the small size and the location of the crack. |
| The Article wrote: | | At the time, top shuttle managers were aware of the foam problem but had dismissed it as a threat. |
I'm elated that the shuttle program is finally back up and running, I love spaceflight. But those two contrasting points alone worry me . . .
|
|
|
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England
|
| Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:36 pm |
|
I'm glad NASA is getting back on it's feet. I'm glad to see this happeneing 
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
webtaz99
Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: The Other Side
|
| Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:56 pm |
|
| Hitchhiker wrote: | | The Article wrote: | The rollout was delayed for a little more than two hours when a crack in the fuel tank's insulation was found. NASA concluded the crack, near a non-cryogenic (low temperature) area, was a minor imperfection and did not need repair.
NASA spokeswoman Tracy Young said the engineering staff decided Discovery can safely fly "as is," because of the small size and the location of the crack. |
| The Article wrote: | | At the time, top shuttle managers were aware of the foam problem but had dismissed it as a threat. |
I'm elated that the shuttle program is finally back up and running, I love spaceflight. But those two contrasting points alone worry me . . .
|
I know what you are saying, but remember that NASA consists of two types of folks: engineers and beaurocrats. No matter who's right, the beaurocrats always win.
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
lionhead
Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
| Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:06 am |
|
So exciting.
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
