Author |
Message |
Saoirse_Granger Lieutenant
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 198 Location: Button Moon
|
Sun Mar 23, 2003 8:48 am Warp Drive |
|
If the clever people in the Daystrom Institute (http://www.ditl.org/) know that mugh about warp, why can't they create it? I know it's a silly question but I think the answer is that we're not a figment of Gene Roddenberry's imagination.
Also, if and when "warp" drive is invented, do you think it will be christened warp, after Star Trek, or just warp because that's sort of what it does? It would be cool if a trekker found warp, and dilithium, and named them all after trek.
|
|
|
PrankishSmart Rear Admiral
Joined: 29 Apr 2002 Posts: 4779 Location: Hobart, Australia.
|
Sun Mar 23, 2003 10:58 am |
|
Well warp is called warp because it distorts the space around the ship to make it move. It 'warps' space itself if that makes any sence.
And Mr Kennedy from the ditl is more of a star trek fanatic rather than a scientist. I have read some very, very long articles a while ago explaining the possible ways of warp travel, but I forgot where I found them.
|
|
|
Saoirse_Granger Lieutenant
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 198 Location: Button Moon
|
Sun Mar 23, 2003 5:00 pm |
|
Does watching star trek not make you a scientist, in a warped kinda way (excuse the pun)?!? I kinda understood the bit about the actual warp of space, I just thought it might be cool if they really did call it warp, not something like dilithium photon power or something (I know photon energy is summat completely diff:P)
|
|
|
Hyper Ensign
Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 60 Location: UK
|
Mon Apr 07, 2003 9:35 pm |
|
You are correct in mentioning about the warp drives warping space time, hence their name. The reason we cant create a warp drive is because you need whats known as a '*beep*' of energy. I have no idea how much, but i'd hazard a guess at the equivelent of 1 gigaton bomb/sec to get to warp 1 for Cochrans ship? Otherwise you only need, and this is no joke, a few metal plates.
-------signature-------
When matter and anti-matter collide, you dont get plasma!
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Tue Apr 22, 2003 6:57 pm |
|
yes, the engines dont actually move the ship, the warp field does
|
|
|
Hyper Ensign
Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 60 Location: UK
|
Tue Apr 22, 2003 8:48 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | yes, the engines dont actually move the ship, the warp field does | LOL! I'm imagining a set of wheels on the back of the engines!
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|