Author |
Message |
jonathan95 Delta Prime
Joined: 29 Oct 2002 Posts: 1544 Location: UK Newcastle
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:40 am Police block M-way to pick up toy |
|
Quote: |
Police block M-way to pick up toy
Police closed a section of the M11 to rescue a girl's soft toy after it flew from the family car in a gust of wind.
Amy Osborn, 10, was returning home to Ramsgate, Kent, from holiday in Essex when her cuddly tiger, Tyrone, escaped through the sunroof.
Her father Simon, who called out Essex Police, said: "One of the officers had children and probably knew the importance of these things."
Police said their action was a "minor inconvenience" to avoid Amy's distress.
The police are obviously very busy ... but I think it's great. It shows their social input and it's something we should be proud of
Simon Osborn
He said the family travelled to the next junction and then turned back to look for the toy.
"It was in the central reservation and there was really not much we could do," he said.
"In desperation, we thought we would call the highway police. They called us when we got home and said they had managed to retrieve the little thing - and popped it in the post for us."
He said the bear had not arrived at the weekend but that Amy - who has owned Tyrone for five years - would be waiting at the door at her home in Ramsgate on Monday.
Mr Osborn added: "The police are obviously very busy and have other things to get on with, but I think it's great.
Road blocked 'for capture'
"It shows their social input and it's something we should be proud of."
A spokesman for Essex Police said: "(Officers) put in a rolling road block for a couple of minutes and so got out safely to capture Tyrone."
Defending the use of police resources, he said: "Any parent would know the distress that their child might suffer from the loss of such a toy.
"It was a minor inconvenience to motorists which I am sure would have been acceptable to all those who have had experienced similar circumstances."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/england/4150386.stm
Published: 2005/08/14 12:14:04 GMT |
as danni said arrrr how cute........
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:47 am |
|
No offence but thats kinda silly, I mean come on as if you would call the police and ask them to get a stuffed tiger! Gosh, they have better things to do then play 'Nanny' to little kids! Seriously
|
|
|
jonathan95 Delta Prime
Joined: 29 Oct 2002 Posts: 1544 Location: UK Newcastle
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:09 am |
|
true,
But look at it from this point of view.
Kids teddy goes out of the window.
Dad stops kids in tears, dad tries to get to teddy big ugly truck not watching what he's doing breaking the law eather eating a sarnie (sandwitch) or on the phone or something not paying attension looks up splat there goes daddy for trying to get to the kids teddy, I think it was a right thing to do for the safeness of it that road is a fast moving one, and not every driver pays that much attension.
But I do agree with you that the police most of the time have better things to do. Like stop drunken idots, catch small children smashing windows,
than making sure a family member isnt killed trying to get a kids teddy bear of a fast moving moterway.
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:11 am |
|
Yeah I do see where you're coming from but there are more stores with plenty more stuffed tigers
|
|
|
jonathan95 Delta Prime
Joined: 29 Oct 2002 Posts: 1544 Location: UK Newcastle
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:22 am |
|
true, but kids get attached to particular toys, and if its not the same then parents can be in for a rough ride.
thinks of samantha's and dolly there was a time where you never saw them apart, and if she didnt have it for bed then could we hell get her to sleep.
kida can be funny that way.
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:25 am |
|
My brother said exactly what you just said. But I really do think that calling the police was a tad extream!
|
|
|
jonathan95 Delta Prime
Joined: 29 Oct 2002 Posts: 1544 Location: UK Newcastle
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:29 am |
|
I think the man called the police station not 999,
if he had called 999 I think that was a bit bad, but calling the local station isnt so bad cas its not afecting the emergancy system.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:01 am |
|
The girl is 10. I think she should have been old enough to deal with the loss of a toy .
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:51 am |
|
I agree with Kevin. 10 is old enough not to cry over a toy. I didn't cry when I was 10 when my sister threw my barbie out. I was way over that extreme. My 6 yr old daughter don't even cry over toys.
Police needs to be watching after criminals, and people who are speeding and stuff. Not just put a block just to find a toy. The dad needed to step his foot down and said no. Kid must have been spoiled in my opinion.
|
|
|
Starbuck faster...
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 8715 Location: between chaos and melody
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:15 am |
|
While it is a tad bit......... I can't think of a good word to go there. That toy is infact a road hazard, seeing as a tiny pebble will cause a car to flip at high speeds.
And, btw, I'm 15 and I cannot sleep without my stuffed dog, and would bawl my eyes out if anything ever happened to it.
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:51 am |
|
I thought soft toys were supposed to be belted in.
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
Seven of Nine Sammie's Mammy
Joined: 16 Jun 2001 Posts: 7871 Location: North East England
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:21 pm |
|
Although the article mainly concentrates on the "social" aspect of the toy's rescue, there is also the safety aspect. If a strong gust of wind (and motorways can get very windy) had picked up the toy, it could have caused a major crash on the motorway, where top speeds are meant to be 70 mph (though some people do go a lot faster). We already have enough accidents on our roads without having another one caused by a stuffed toy.
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:44 pm |
|
Quote: | her cuddly tiger, Tyrone |
Which one is it?
Anyway . . . it's one of those things that don't happen every day
Being still attached to my plethora of stuffed animals, I know I would be upset if one of mine flew out of a moving vehicle.
|
|
|
Lord Borg Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 11214 Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:40 pm |
|
^ I have some stuffed toys im attached to, a couple I have had most, if not all my life, one was made by my great-grandmother, and i would be very distressed if something happend to it
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:29 am |
|
/\ Yeah but would you call the police and get them to find you're toy?
|
|
|
Starbuck faster...
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 8715 Location: between chaos and melody
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:07 am |
|
Hell yes I would. If my stuffie flew out of my car and landed somewhere on the highway, I would call the coppers and make them go get it.
|
|
|
Lord Borg Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 11214 Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:14 am |
|
nadia wrote: | /\ Yeah but would you call the police and get them to find you're toy? |
I dont know what I would do, I know I would want it back.
|
|
|
jonathan95 Delta Prime
Joined: 29 Oct 2002 Posts: 1544 Location: UK Newcastle
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:40 pm |
|
ok 1 i am drunk.
But I d like to Point out to Nadia.
that so far your opinion has been you wouldnt call the police.
yet so far a good number has said that they would call the police out simply in this situation as it was a safty risk mainly.
and as you can see a lot of people are still attached to there childhood toy's no matter how old they are.
what people are simply saying is this: (from what I see)
1. If it was there toy than they would do the same thing as this couple did to save a childs toy. rather that risc a worse sanario/
2. a lot of people in this world are still insicure and like to have a safety thing like a toy or a blanket.
3. the parents in this case acted with in the most safest possible was. they instead of risking there own live's on a bizy road called in people that could contain with the most understanding of the public.
so far nadia's argument has simply been but its the police
the police if they had better things to do would simply not have attended in such a short time as they did, we here in the UK still bleave in a person's trade that is help those who would them selfs.
Think of it this way,
If that father of that child had went out on his own got hit by a car and died.
It would have been
Police,
Ambulance
Fire Brigade
instead of just a few cop cars to make an area safe to retreive something off a road in which it could have casused death.
Quote: |
I am very sorry if I have offended everybody I am just sick of nadia making out that it was silly to make such an effort to make sure things went smothly and safly with out a death toll. |
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:11 pm |
|
jonathan95 wrote: | ok 1 i am drunk. |
You're a mod, be responsible. You don't need to post if you're intoxicated.
I'm with Nadia on this one. The police are there to protect society, not take care of little kids. What if there was a real emergency, like a bank robbery or a criminal escaping by vehicle? And here are a slew of police cars and manpower trying to get a stuffed toy. They may not be able to respond in time to the real emergency. Its a waste of resources and tax dollars, IMO.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
borgslayer Rear Admiral
Joined: 27 Aug 2003 Posts: 2646 Location: Las Vegas
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:14 pm |
|
Why even report such a thing?
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:22 pm |
|
jonathan95 wrote: |
Quote: |
I am very sorry if I have offended everybody I am just sick of nadia making out that it was silly to make such an effort to make sure things went smothly and safly with out a death toll. |
|
/\/\/ Who wrote that?/\/\/\/
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:24 pm |
|
Absolutely nobody.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:10 am |
|
Ok, well thats really stupid of who ever wrote that to say it because it was MY opinion ok, so there's no need for anyone to get all hanky panky at me!
|
|
|
Five - seveN Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 3567 Location: Shadow Moon
|
Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:10 am |
|
LOL. I find this very funny. Who would expect this is still possible in today's ever-stressful society? I like this move, a lot.
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:25 am |
|
Puck wrote: | The girl is 10. I think she should have been old enough to deal with the loss of a toy . |
So agree! My brother had a cuddly toy called "Dog" whom he took everywhere. He quite often dangled Dog out of the window on the motor way and was told that if he dropped it Dog would be lost forever. Therefore, he took good care of Dog (in fact, he loved him so much the ink on his plastic eyes wore off and everyone commented on his cataracts), who is now retired in a purpose built wooden kennel in my brother's bedroom.
My brother is now 18 and has more cuddly toys now than ever (although they tend to have slightly more imaginative names) and he looks after them and treats them with respect.
Basically, what I'm trying to say, is that if you can't hold on to a toy you love so dearly and it ends up on the motorway then you kinda deserve it for not holding on hard enough.
Stupid girl.
One more thing, if a ten year old can't cope with a toy they're only had for half their life, how are they going to cope when Grandpa dies?
|
|
|
|