Author |
Message |
Number_6 Senior Cadet
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 27 Location: In The Village
|
Thu Aug 11, 2005 3:46 pm Queer Theory and the Original Star Wars Trilogy |
|
I alluded to this over in the Voyager forum, where some people were having a discussion on whether or not any of the actors on that show were gay. Since the discussion was amiable enough, and people here seem to have a pretty open and tolerant attitude, I thought I�d post something in this forum about what I�ve learned over the years regarding the homosexual subtext of the original Star Wars trilogy, particularly A New Hope. I posted this once on another board which was unfortunately closed before I could get many replies, so it would be nice to see if the conversation that never developed over there might develop over here.
Now I know this is going to sound a bit off-the-wall, but this rumor/interpretation has apparently been going around in the gay community for quite a long time. Last term, as I was making plans to teach A New Hope in a literature and film course (I teach college English), and I was told by a gay colleague that I should let students know about the veiled references to a homosexual relationship in the cantina scene between Han Solo and Greedo, and the fact that it�s more than likely that the argument between Greedo and Solo went beyond Solo�s fight with Jabba, and was actually the final argument in a lover�s tiff.
First of all, Greedo�s mouth was apparently designed to suggest a �pocket pu$$y,� and I have to admit, it certainly does look like one. Greedo�s orifice opens wide and invitingly at the precise moment he says �If you give it to me, I might forget I found you,� suggesting that Greedo would be willing to exchange oral favors with Solo in return for letting him make the trip to Alderaan to get Jabba�s money. For a few years after the release of the film, a blow job was often referred to as �getting a Greedo� among the gay community.
Greedo�s accusation to Solo about smugglers who drop their shipment plays on 70s slang in the homosexual community�smuggling a shipment referring to anal sex. When a smuggler �drops his shipment,� it means he�s left (or cheated on) his anal partner. Solo�s reply, �Even I get boarded sometimes� is a reference to the fact that he has been smuggling something other than Greedo�s member, hence Greedo�s anger.
Even the Huttese language that Greedo speaks contains veiled references to homosexuality. In the New York gay community�specifically the patrons of Studio 54�the brand name Frito-Lay had somehow gotten corrupted to the phrase �Peter-Lay,� obviously referring to gay sex. My colleague wasn�t sure what the exact origin of this phrase was�like the Cosmopolitan, many people claim to have invented it�but when Greedo says �Song pich aley,� he actually pronounces it like �Peter-Lay,� and this was apparently deliberate on the part of the voice-over actor, as he was instructed to say the words �Peter-Lay.� Also, �eating a bag of Fritos� was a term for what�s now called �tea bagging.� Weird.
This was also the reason why Solo was so uninterested in Leia as a beautiful princess in A New Hope�he just wasn�t interested in women. When Han says to Luke, �I don�t know . . . what do you think? Do you think a princess, and a guy like me . . .� it�s a veiled reference to his homosexuality, and apparently got a big laugh from gay audience members.
Now I�m not a big fan of the �queering� of literature and film, but my colleague seems to have most of his ducks in a row, and another gay colleague knew instantly what he was talking about, and started describing the same things to me. Since then, I have emailed several gay colleagues at other institutions, and all say that they are aware of the theory and that they are surprised it has not gained more credence in readings of A New Hope.
This was apparently deliberate on the part of Lucas, who included the references in an attempt to deliver a pro-gay message that would go over the heads of the studio but still reach its intended audience. But, not long after the release of the A New Hope, Lucas became more family oriented in his outlook, and denied the rumors, chalking it up to odd coincidence, and arguing that he had always intended Han and Leia to get together, when it�s pretty clear that Luke and Leia were intended for one another in the original plan. For some reason, the gay community has given him a pass, and left it alone, but recent setbacks in the gay rights movement have apparently changed some minds.
Yet despite this movement towards more family-oriented entertainment, Lucas did allow further veiled references to homosexuality to be included in Return of the Jedi, particularly in the character of Jabba and his relationship with Salacious Crumb, which que er theorists have had a ball with (pun intended), characterizing the relationship as a stereotypical boi/daddy one. It also occurs to me that the fact that Jabba is basically a big slug also plays into this whole reading. Notice that while he has two female slaves, both of whom he appears to make advances towards, the most he is able to do with Leia is lick her. Now in the gay community the term "slugging" means to fellate a flaccid pe nis to the point of orgasm, though the pe nis itself never gets hard because of impotency, generally brought on by guilt at engaging in a homosexual relationship. Given Jabba's female slaves, the burly male nature of his court, and the Salacious Crumb boi/daddy relationship, it's more than likely that shaping Jabba as a slug is a reference to his own homosexuality, revealed in part by his ability to do more to Leia than to lick her, a not-so-veiled reference to cunnilingus, often the last resort of a male unable to satisfy his mate through coition. Jabba is able to satisfy neither male nor female partners, his conflicted sexuality making it impossible for him to "rise to the occasion."
From everything I�ve read, the queering of Star Wars has only just begun. If the corroboration of some of the original filming crew can be obtained, then it will be clear that Lucas was sending this veiled message of support to the homosexual community.
So, I know that�s a lot to digest, and it may seem ridiculous to some of you, but this is serious stuff in the world of cultural studies and queer theory. I ask you to please approach what I�ve posted with an open mind, and let me know what you think. Queer bashers need not respond.
|
|
|
Nicephorus Crewman
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 Posts: 1
|
Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:21 pm |
|
Seems to me you're kind of obssessed with the idea that there're so many gay characters in Star Wars.
Are you sure that you're not trying to will these characters into being gay so that you are more comfortable with the films? Are you secretly attracted to Jar-Jar, because if there was a gay character in the Star Wars saga, it was definitely him.
You know he was hitting the bath houses on Coruscant.
So...is that it? Not happy that queers are fashionable, they gotta break into sci-fi too?
What next, pro football?
-------signature-------
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:45 am |
|
isn't "Queer" a curse word? why is that allowed?
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
Birdy Socialist
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 13502 Location: Here.
|
|
|
Number_6 Senior Cadet
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 27 Location: In The Village
|
Fri Aug 12, 2005 11:38 am |
|
"Queer" is NOT a curse word.
As I explained in the thread referenced above, "queer theory" is the term for the sort of reading of the trilogy I'm discussing in this thread.
"Queer" is part of modern parlance--witness Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. It hasn't been a "curse word" for a long time.
As for Nicephorus, you seem to have a problem with homosexuality, and yours is not the sort of response I was looking for here.
I'm serious. This is considered a viable reading of Star Wars. I'd like to hear what some thoughtful fans have to say.
|
|
|
Number_6 Senior Cadet
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 27 Location: In The Village
|
Sat Aug 13, 2005 12:53 am |
|
I'd really hoped to get some replies to this thread. I'm quite curious to know how fans react to what academics do to the films they love.
Anybody?
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Sat Aug 13, 2005 1:24 am |
|
I disagree with you. There is nothing "gay" about Star Wars. Even of there was a Gay alien in the backround, that doesn't matter. That isn't what the series is about at all. Its very epic and has a destiny theme to it. Not a Gay underlying one. The Greedo thing? I;m sorry, but that is just plain immaturity. Greedo's look? He is supposed to have an insect look to him. Not some weird sex thing. Thats disgusting that anyone sees it like that anyways and immature. As for the sexual innuendo in their conversation, Star Wars is racked with that all over. Especially in ANH.
"Wedge! Pull out! You're not doing any good back there!"
"Luke, at that speed do you think you'll be able to pull out in time?"
"You've got something jammed in here real good."
"Look at the size of that thing!"
"Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"
"Size matters not. Judge me by my size, do you?"
"Hurry up, golden-rod..."
"Possible he came in through the south entrance."
"Grab me, Chewie. I'm slipping -- hold on. Grab it, almost... you almost got it. Gently now, all right, easy, easy, hold me Chewie."
"Back door, huh? Good idea!"
"She's gonna blow!"
The list goes on and on. It all depends on how "sick" your mind is. If you look for things like that in movies, you'll always find it. The idea that Han Solo is a homosexual is stupid beyond relief. Even that quote you cited that is a "veiled reference to his homosexuality" does not really cut it. In no way is it Gay.
I'm sure that wasn't the feedback you wanted, but that is just my personal opinion. I know that Lucas wasn't trying to somehow push for the gay agenda in these movies. I think he was just trying to make a space soap opera and he succeeded.
|
|
|
Captain Patrick Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 2421
|
Sat Aug 13, 2005 1:31 am |
|
I have to agree with Founder on this topic, it is not a gay themed trilogy just one that was made back in the day when comments like that was not thought to be a gay comment or sick one it is just that immature people today think about it that way.
In my personel opinoin there is nothing gay or queer about the comments/quotes posted above.
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:12 am |
|
.
Ah, i didn't read that topic...
Why do i have a dej� vu right now?
Anyways, i'm not enlgish so i thought it was a curse word. Nevemrind.
I too agree with Founder on this. To give some meaning too my presence in this topic. But i always saw C3PO as kinda... you know. I think that wasn't intentional, but thats how sick my mind is.
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
JanewayLover Ensign
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 Posts: 48
|
Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:27 pm |
|
This is actually common knowledge among the gays I associate with. When we were in "mixed company", the guys would sometimes disappear with the explanation of "getting a greedo". Of course, the straights in the room all thought they were watching Star Wars. We knew better.
And I remember one year, in the Halloween Parade that takes place in the Village, there was a Jabba/Crumb couple. The way they were dressed, you knew what they were supposed to be.
I always thought it was the best kept secret among gays, though. I guess not anymore.
|
|
|
Lord Borg Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 11214 Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:55 am |
|
Founder wrote: | I disagree with you. There is nothing "gay" about Star Wars. Even of there was a Gay alien in the backround, that doesn't matter. That isn't what the series is about at all. Its very epic and has a destiny theme to it. Not a Gay underlying one. The Greedo thing? I;m sorry, but that is just plain immaturity. Greedo's look? He is supposed to have an insect look to him. Not some weird sex thing. Thats disgusting that anyone sees it like that anyways and immature. As for the sexual innuendo in their conversation, Star Wars is racked with that all over. Especially in ANH.
"Wedge! Pull out! You're not doing any good back there!"
"Luke, at that speed do you think you'll be able to pull out in time?"
"You've got something jammed in here real good."
"Look at the size of that thing!"
"Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"
"Size matters not. Judge me by my size, do you?"
"Hurry up, golden-rod..."
"Possible he came in through the south entrance."
"Grab me, Chewie. I'm slipping -- hold on. Grab it, almost... you almost got it. Gently now, all right, easy, easy, hold me Chewie."
"Back door, huh? Good idea!"
"She's gonna blow!"
The list goes on and on. It all depends on how "sick" your mind is. If you look for things like that in movies, you'll always find it. The idea that Han Solo is a homosexual is stupid beyond relief. Even that quote you cited that is a "veiled reference to his homosexuality" does not really cut it. In no way is it Gay.
I'm sure that wasn't the feedback you wanted, but that is just my personal opinion. I know that Lucas wasn't trying to somehow push for the gay agenda in these movies. I think he was just trying to make a space soap opera and he succeeded. |
I thought it best to quote founder, then to say it all over again, as I agree with what he said.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 1:09 pm |
|
I would say exactly as Lord Borg said. There is absolutely NOTHING gay about Star Wars, and in all honesty, and with all due respect, I find it silly to think that there is. Especially the Han-Greedo idea. That is simply DISGUSTING.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Number_6 Senior Cadet
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 27 Location: In The Village
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:42 pm |
|
Well, now a second person has come in with a first-hand account of the believe that the Han/Greedo scene has homosexual implications, and that the term "getting a Greedo" was in common use in the gay community in the late 1970s.
Look, I'm not making this up myself, just reporting what I've heard.
However, the few reactions this has gotten so far are interesting. I'm sensing a bit of an antagonistic attitude towards homosexuality on this board. Is this generally the case around here? If so, then your reactions may not be indicative of the general reaction of Star Wars fans.
Just don't shoot the messenger, okay?
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 3:10 pm |
|
Some people can find sexual inuendos in anything, and I think that's what some of the gay comunity have been doing. As for Greedo's probuscus looking like a �pocket pu$$y,� I don't think they were even invented when A New Hope came out! (no pun about coming out of the closet intended)
I totally agree with Founder on this subject.
|
|
|
Captain Patrick Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 2421
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:38 pm |
|
A New Hope wrote: | GREEDO: Going somewhere, Solo?
HAN: Yes, Greedo. As a matter of fact, I was just going to see your
boss. Tell Jabba that I've got his money.
GREEDO: It's too late. You should have paid him when you had the
chance. Jabba's put a price on your head, so large that every bounty
hunter in the galaxy will be looking for you. I'm lucky I found you
first.
HAN: Yeah, but this time I got the money.
GREEDO: If you give it to me, I might forget I found you.
HAN: I don't have it with me. Tell Jabba...
GREEDO: Jabba's through with you. He has no time for smugglers who
drop their shipments at the first sign of an Imperial cruiser.
HAN: Even I get boarded sometimes. Do you think I had a choice?
GREEDO: You can tell that to Jabba. He may only take your ship.
HAN: Over my dead body.
GREEDO: That's the idea. I've been looking forward to this for
a long time.
HAN: Yes, I'll bet you have. |
There is nothing gay about that seen or implied in that seen, and back when the movie was made Pocket Pu**y was not raley used or looked like Greedo's mouth.
A New Hope wrote: | Jabba: Han, my boy, your the best |
Also when Jabba said this a lot of people make comments about it but no gay thing was implied when it was used in the script.
A New Hope wrote: | BIGGS: He's on me tight, I can't shake him...I can't shake him.
WEDGE: Look at the size of that thing!
LUKE: This is Red Five; I'm going in!
LUKE: I'm on my way in now...
LUKE: Hang on, Biggs, I'm coming in. |
Nothing gay was was implied in those commments either it is just that people today have sick mind and they take good movies and find things like that in them and make them look gay.
Number_6 wrote: | However, the few reactions this has gotten so far are interesting. I'm sensing a bit of an antagonistic attitude towards homosexuality on this board. Is this generally the case around here? If so, then your reactions may not be indicative of the general reaction of Star Wars fans. |
And no one on this board it antagonistic towards Homosexuality, their are lots of Homosexuals and Bisexuals on this board including myself who do not find anything about this movie to be gay.
|
|
|
JanewayLover Ensign
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 Posts: 48
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:12 pm |
|
Hey! What happened to my last post? It disappeared.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:08 pm |
|
I don't see what the big deal would be even if there was an underlying homsexual meaning... Or whatever. Who knows? Or even better.... who cares?
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:16 pm |
|
Captain Patrick wrote: | A New Hope wrote: | GREEDO: Going somewhere, Solo?
HAN: Yes, Greedo. As a matter of fact, I was just going to see your
boss. Tell Jabba that I've got his money.
GREEDO: It's too late. You should have paid him when you had the
chance. Jabba's put a price on your head, so large that every bounty
hunter in the galaxy will be looking for you. I'm lucky I found you
first.
HAN: Yeah, but this time I got the money.
GREEDO: If you give it to me, I might forget I found you.
HAN: I don't have it with me. Tell Jabba...
GREEDO: Jabba's through with you. He has no time for smugglers who
drop their shipments at the first sign of an Imperial cruiser.
HAN: Even I get boarded sometimes. Do you think I had a choice?
GREEDO: You can tell that to Jabba. He may only take your ship.
HAN: Over my dead body.
GREEDO: That's the idea. I've been looking forward to this for
a long time.
HAN: Yes, I'll bet you have. |
There is nothing gay about that seen or implied in that seen, and back when the movie was made Pocket Pu**y was not raley used or looked like Greedo's mouth.
A New Hope wrote: | Jabba: Han, my boy, your the best |
Also when Jabba said this a lot of people make comments about it but no gay thing was implied when it was used in the script.
A New Hope wrote: | BIGGS: He's on me tight, I can't shake him...I can't shake him.
WEDGE: Look at the size of that thing!
LUKE: This is Red Five; I'm going in!
LUKE: I'm on my way in now...
LUKE: Hang on, Biggs, I'm coming in. |
Nothing gay was was implied in those commments either it is just that people today have sick mind and they take good movies and find things like that in them and make them look gay.
Number_6 wrote: | However, the few reactions this has gotten so far are interesting. I'm sensing a bit of an antagonistic attitude towards homosexuality on this board. Is this generally the case around here? If so, then your reactions may not be indicative of the general reaction of Star Wars fans. |
And no one on this board it antagonistic towards Homosexuality, their are lots of Homosexuals and Bisexuals on this board including myself who do not find anything about this movie to be gay. |
Agreed. Fully. Well put. However, some of us ARE antagonistic towards homosexuality, but that doesn't mean that we hate homosexuals or anything. I think it's sinful to act on gay emotions, but your point is well seen (and this debate isn't over homosexuality).
And Intrepid, obviously this person does, as he/she posted this, and I think it's just disgusting and that some of these things pointed out are showing of what a sick mind could conjure up--the Biggs thing in particular, that is. Look for a religious meaning, sure. Look for historical meanings, yes. But homosexual meanings? There are none and it's rather sick, in my opinion, to be looking at it in the way that some people are. Looking for something that may actually be is fine, but NOTHING there is, and these arguements really are baseless. In no way did GL intend to include homosexual meanings in this.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:20 pm |
|
How do you know that he didn't, exactly?
I don't see how its "sick." I might if its based off of something true, but its fiction. And there isn't a law against homosexuality in fiction. Movies are open for interpretation, no matter how you want to see it.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:43 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | How do you know that he didn't, exactly?
I don't see how its "sick." I might if its based off of something true, but its fiction. And there isn't a law against homosexuality in fiction. Movies are open for interpretation, no matter how you want to see it. |
What is sick is that the movie wasn't made for that. Its obvious that it doesn't have homosexual underlying themes. Gay and immature people just thought it would be funny to say things like that. Greedo's "pocket p***y"? Its blatantly obvious that, that was not the intention.
I'm sure some people here believe that Lucas was somehow "supporting" homosexuality through all of that. I thinks thats sad if you do think that. You're looking for something that isn't there.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:46 pm |
|
Well, its fiction. Whos to say what isn't there and what is? I personally don't see it, but its just a movie. You can see whatever you want.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:49 pm |
|
Exactly. Its a matter of what you want to see. Its like sitting with a little kid at a movie and they laugh because "That alien's mouth looks like a "p***y!!!" ha. ha. I'm sure you would find that annoying and immature. The kids are missing the point. Lucas just tried to make an exotic looking alien. Its not his fault thats all they can see.
|
|
|
Jeff Miller Fleet Admiral
Joined: 22 Nov 2001 Posts: 23947 Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:04 am |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Well, its fiction. Whos to say what isn't there and what is? I personally don't see it, but its just a movie. You can see whatever you want. |
I agree, I've seen this same arguement over dozens of other movies. It's ultimately up to the viewer of the move of what they see.
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:04 pm |
|
I agree with Aaron. Everyone gets something different from a movie, something that makes it personally identifiable. But really, who cares?
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
Captain Skyline Vice Admiral
Joined: 09 Aug 2001 Posts: 6646 Location: UK
|
Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:44 am |
|
I think your looking too much into this,
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|