Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:21 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Is Enterprise Killing Trek?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Enterprise This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Doc
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 16 Jul 2001
Posts: 83
Location: Lost, exploring every square centimeter of the Delta Quadrant!!

PostSat Sep 06, 2003 11:08 am    Is Enterprise Killing Trek?

I was reading somewhere that Enterprise's ratings were so low this last season that it may not make it much longer, but that's not all! With UPN removing Voyager from the air in favor for Enterprise and Enterprise's bad habit of constantly slapping people in the face with comentaries, Star Trek is losing viewers. What's your opinion?


-------signature-------

SPOCK--- If I were a Human, I believe my response would be: "To Hell with our orders" IF I were Human.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Los
Commodore


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 1336
Location: Oklahoma fa sho!

PostSat Sep 06, 2003 12:51 pm    

No, but why is any Star Trek show on UPN? Shouldn't it be on like Fox or something?

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Capt.Rene D'Hondt
Lieutenant


Joined: 22 Jul 2003
Posts: 182
Location: Ontario,Canada

PostSat Sep 06, 2003 10:47 pm    

With the low veiwers watching ENT it would for sure get taking of the air if it was on FOX....season 3 has to be better and get more veiwers or unfortunetly ENT isdone.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSun Sep 07, 2003 4:07 pm    

I've only ever seen two episodes of ENT. For the most part, we can't get it where I live. It'd be great if like most TV shows they let a nationally syndicated station pick up the older seasons and rebroadcast them.

It does rather seem that Trek is imploding atm, though.



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostFri Sep 12, 2003 8:43 pm    

YES! and YES!

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
The_Doctor
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 339

PostSun Sep 14, 2003 5:31 pm    Enterprise is ok...

Enterprise is ok, I think most of the begginning episodes were alright, but recently it has gotten better, has there been a writer change or something? And I wish it was on ABC or some other station, for some reason I hate UPN, to me they are just a weird wanna be ABC station that few people tune into.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jadzia Lenara Dax
Garbage Queen


Joined: 17 Oct 2001
Posts: 5761
Location: Sunnydale, California

PostMon Sep 15, 2003 2:05 pm    

[moved from gen. trek. specific series. jad.]


-------signature-------

"I can't stand someone who can outdepress me." -Shirley Manson, Garbage




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
hdn
Lieutenant


Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 163
Location: Sweden

PostMon Sep 15, 2003 2:37 pm    

Enterprise has viewers with very different opinions... In my opinion, Enterprise is the best Trek. You may think I'm really stupid, but that's what I think. I will be *very* sorry if they stop doing episodes just because the ratings aren't that high. Could low ratings really stop them from doing 7 seasons?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Los
Commodore


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 1336
Location: Oklahoma fa sho!

PostMon Sep 15, 2003 5:55 pm    

Think about it. More people watch Fox than UPN. If you have a bigger base to start with, the chances would be in favor of you to survive the first couple of months.

Its common sense folks.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostMon Sep 15, 2003 7:22 pm    

Los wrote:
Think about it. More people watch Fox than UPN. If you have a bigger base to start with, the chances would be in favor of you to survive the first couple of months.

Its common sense folks.


No it isn't. Firefly got ratings only slightly lower than ENT's are now, and it was (arguably) a far better show than Enterprise. Just more fun to watch.

Cancelled after 15 episodes.

Look at Fox's history. Over the past decade or so, they've started around 15 SF/F series. The only one to survive more than two seasons was The X-Files. Most of them didn't even go one season.

Fox and Science Fiction don't mix.

Now, CBS *might* improve ENT's ratings. But more likely, the ratings will stay the same, and it'll be cancelled even sooner. The only way the ratings will improve is if ENT improves big-time in the writing department, and stops being derivative.

Its *possible* that might happen. But if it does, it had better be soon. The only reason UPN has kept it around this long, I suspect, is because ENT is the only thing keeping UPN from completely imploding as a network.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Los
Commodore


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 1336
Location: Oklahoma fa sho!

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 12:13 am    

Firefly was a good show, I'm not doubting that, but look at the fanbase. Firefly had next to none, starting from scratch, while on the other hand, Star Trek has millions of viewers!

Star Trek: TNG, DS9, and Voyager went longer than 3 seasons, TNG finishing 3-7 on Fox (If I'm not mistaken, they did all seven series on Fox), DS9 did all seven (though moved to the Friday night slot, past 11pm) and Voyager was on 4 when they moved it to UPN. Needless to say, Star Trek fans will watch, no matter how much they dislike it.

Its like a drug.

I don't see it on CBS because CBS is crap.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 11:30 am    

TNG and DS9 were in first-run syndication. Its possible they aired on Fox, but they weren't produced by Fox.

If CBS is crap, then UPN is in trouble---they're under the same management.

Quote:
Firefly was a good show, I'm not doubting that, but look at the fanbase. Firefly had next to none, starting from scratch, while on the other hand, Star Trek has millions of viewers!


*Had* millions of viewers. I'm not convinced it does anymore.

The numbers for "Broken Bow" showed how many people are interested in Trek; the numbers that have fallen since then show the percentage of those who think ENT isn't worth watching (or at least, not worth watching in real time). People who watch the weekend rerun or tape the show aren't counted.

If Trek still had as large a fanbase as it once did, Nemesis wouldn't have had such a poor box office.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
1/1
Rear Admiral


Joined: 12 Apr 2002
Posts: 3311
Location: La La Land

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 1:12 pm    

Lindley wrote:
If Trek still had as large a fanbase as it once did, Nemesis wouldn't have had such a poor box office.


Nemisis didn't make as good a box office as they would have liked because they released it the same weekend as Lord Of The Rings. I think Star Trek still has a large fanbase and ENT will run for 7 seasons on whatever channel it's on



-------signature-------


New Earth, New Hopes . . . and then theres Harry Kim!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
someone
Commodore


Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 1198
Location: not on site(left)

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 1:34 pm    

I think that ENTERPRISE is an embarrasment to startrek, lol


-------signature-------

SEE YA ALL ON ANOTHER SITE, GOOBYE NOW!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
hdn
Lieutenant


Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 163
Location: Sweden

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 1:57 pm    

And why is that? I can't understand how you are thinking when you simple say that it is the worst crap ever made... I really can't.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
someone
Commodore


Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 1198
Location: not on site(left)

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 2:11 pm    

I didn't.
I just said it was an embarrasment to startrek, just like ds9, lol


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Doc
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 16 Jul 2001
Posts: 83
Location: Lost, exploring every square centimeter of the Delta Quadrant!!

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 2:14 pm    

HdN wrote:
Enterprise has viewers with very different opinions... In my opinion, Enterprise is the best Trek. You may think I'm really stupid, but that's what I think. I will be *very* sorry if they stop doing episodes just because the ratings aren't that high. Could low ratings really stop them from doing 7 seasons?

Why shouldn't they? They ended TOS because of low ratings and viewers!


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
hdn
Lieutenant


Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 163
Location: Sweden

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 2:17 pm    

But TOS still made 7 seasons?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Thomas
Pool Princess


Joined: 08 Jul 2001
Posts: 19730
Location: Manchester

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 2:19 pm    

^ No, TOS had 3 seasons.


-------signature-------

Gloss rhymes with hair!

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Doc
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 16 Jul 2001
Posts: 83
Location: Lost, exploring every square centimeter of the Delta Quadrant!!

PostTue Sep 16, 2003 2:25 pm    

Los wrote:
Firefly was a good show, I'm not doubting that, but look at the fanbase. Firefly had next to none, starting from scratch, while on the other hand, Star Trek has millions of viewers!

Yes, you have a point... Trek does have millions of viewers worldwide. But those viewers have come to expect something from Trek. Roddenberry set a tradition in TOS that's been carried through TNG, DS9, VOY, and almost all the movies. Enterprise refuses to follow that tradition. I know people who stoped watching ENT just because of the theme song, just because it has words and it's not instrumental.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostWed Sep 17, 2003 12:48 am    

someone wrote:
I didn't.
I just said it was an embarrasment to startrek, just like ds9, lol


DS9 wasn't traditional Star Trek, it was much darker in tone. But it was a damned good show. Not an embarrassment at all, despite a rather large number of ho-hum episodes in the first couple of seasons. Overall, it was very nearly as good as Babylon 5.

ENT, on the other hand.....I honestly would not care if it were cancelled. I'm still watching, but only because there's nothing else on at that hour. I don't care about the characters and the storylines hardly ever have much meat to them.

And I'm damned annoyed by the fact that every single scene is dominated by the color blue.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Skyline
Vice Admiral


Joined: 09 Aug 2001
Posts: 6646
Location: UK

PostWed Sep 17, 2003 3:55 am    

I think Enterprise is a very poor show, i was dissapointed with the first 2 seasons, i have yet to see the 3rd, so ill still give it a chance, but if series 3 is no good then, ill give up and say enterprise is doomed and its gonna take the startrek genre with it.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Doc
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 16 Jul 2001
Posts: 83
Location: Lost, exploring every square centimeter of the Delta Quadrant!!

PostWed Sep 17, 2003 10:49 am    

ENT had better start getting better! I just saw the season premere last night. I've always liked how Trek has been a show that families could watch for the most part, but Enterprise really smashed that with this show. There was a toppless scene with T'Pol! I won't let my little sisters watch ENT again.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
hdn
Lieutenant


Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 163
Location: Sweden

PostWed Sep 17, 2003 11:23 am    

Oh, for Gods sake! And what does that topless scene "show"? You don't let your sister go bathing at the beach at summer as well? It seams to me that you are trying VERY hard to find wrongs with Enterprise. So you sit and torture yourself through ever episode? It's a great show, you just won't see it because you're pissed of by something. You're pesimistic.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Los
Commodore


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 1336
Location: Oklahoma fa sho!

PostWed Sep 17, 2003 4:17 pm    

NEMESIS WAS RELEASED A WEEK BEFORE LORD OF THE RINGS AND HARRY POTTER!!! Every movie that has been released in that time frame has absolutely sucked compared to how they would've done being released months in advance. Had Nemesis been released a month or even two months prior to LOTR or HP, then most definately, it would've scored higher in the box office that it had. This is the biggest argument in the ST camps: If you're going to release a movie, don't release it next to likely blockbusters. Star Trek will not hold its own.

Quote:
TNG and DS9 were in first-run syndication. Its possible they aired on Fox, but they weren't produced by Fox.


No, TNG and DS9 were not in first run syndications. TNG and DS9 ended their shows on Fox, as I recall recording hundreds of new episodes from the tube when they aired every friday night. When they say "Next time on Star Trek" and you have commercials that say "an all new episode of Star Trek", I don't think they'd be lying to you like that. Voyager premiered on Fox as well, but moved off to UPN shortly after.

CBS is crap: What's the last good show they had outside of Everyone Loves Raymond?

Quote:
The numbers for "Broken Bow" showed how many people are interested in Trek; the numbers that have fallen since then show the percentage of those who think ENT isn't worth watching (or at least, not worth watching in real time). People who watch the weekend rerun or tape the show aren't counted.


Too bad. I think alot of the fans lie in this area.

Quote:
DS9 wasn't traditional Star Trek, it was much darker in tone. But it was a damned good show. Not an embarrassment at all, despite a rather large number of ho-hum episodes in the first couple of seasons. Overall, it was very nearly as good as Babylon 5.


I'll agree with you on the DS9 point until you say its almost as good as Babylon 5. Don't get me wrong, I thought Babylon 5 was great, but sometimes... the stories just blew worse than me making up stories for DS9. But I liked the whole culmination of the Shadow Wars, then the Centauri domination of that one place.



Quote:
ENT had better start getting better! I just saw the season premere last night. I've always liked how Trek has been a show that families could watch for the most part, but Enterprise really smashed that with this show. There was a toppless scene with T'Pol! I won't let my little sisters watch ENT again.


Cry me a river. Like TNG was really a family show. What about when Picard was stripped to his skin, being interrogated by the Cardassians? Or how TNG seemed to glorify Riker's avid sexual taste for alien women, or at least, present it in undertones and subtle messages? What's worse? Visual exposure or mental/subconcious exposure?

Anyways, I'm done with my rant.



-------signature-------

Dilithium Crystals prove the existence of protoculture.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com